ZERO chance of Bush attacking Iran
sinalizar
Mensagens 1 - 10 de 421 - Recolher todas
/groups/adfetch?adid=lKvdRxAAAAAFTbxliJzKRAitWIoqd75C
ZERO chance of Bush attacking Iran  
O grupo no qual você está postando é um grupo da Usenet. As mensagens postadas neste grupo farão com que o seu e-mail fique visível para qualquer pessoa na internet.
Sua resposta não foi enviada.
Postagem publicada
 
De:
Para:
Cc:
Encaminhar para
Adicionar Cc | Adicionar Encaminhar para | Editar Assunto
Assunto:
Validação:
Com o objetivo de verificação, digite os caracteres que você vê na figura abaixo ou os números que ouvir ao clicar no ícone de acessibilidade. Ouça e digite os números que ouvir
 
1.  Baldin Lee Pramer  
Ver perfil   Traduzir para Traduzido (ver original)
(1 usuário)  Mais opções 31 jul 2007, 17:00
Grupos de notícias: alt.politics.bush, alt.politics.british, us.military.navy, soc.culture.iranian, soc.culture.japan
De: Baldin Lee Pramer <baldinpra...@msn.com>
Data: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 13:00:18 -0700
Local: Ter 31 jul 2007 17:00
Assunto: Re: ZERO chance of Bush attacking Iran
On Jul 31, 4:30 am, Dogfucker Cranston <bastardtroll...@yahoo.com>
wrote:

How do you know what Bush thinks? They have plans drawn up for bombing
their reactors. It *might* be a bad idea, but how do you know Bush
knows that or thinks that? He is not a brilliant military mind, or the
type of guy who actually does thinking on his own.

BLP


    Responder ao autor    Encaminhar  
É necessário Acessar antes de postar mensagens.
Para postar uma mensagem você precisa primeiro participar deste grupo.
Atualize seu apelido na página de configurações da inscrição antes de postar.
Você não tem a permissão necessária para postar.
2.  Dogfucker Cranston  
Ver perfil   Traduzir para Traduzido (ver original)
 Mais opções 31 jul 2007, 17:37
Grupos de notícias: alt.politics.bush, alt.politics.british, us.military.navy, soc.culture.iranian, soc.culture.japan
De: Dogfucker Cranston <bastardtroll...@yahoo.com>
Data: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 13:37:54 -0700
Local: Ter 31 jul 2007 17:37
Assunto: Re: ZERO chance of Bush attacking Iran
On 31 Jul, 21:00, Baldin Lee Pramer <baldinpra...@msn.com> wrote:

> How do you know what Bush thinks? They have plans drawn up for bombing
> their reactors. It *might* be a bad idea, but how do you know Bush
> knows that or thinks that?

Because he has decided to leave office without attacking Iran. He made
this decision after being told by the CIA and Gates and Condi that
attacking Iran was a bad idea. If he was going to do it he would've
done it ages ago.

    Responder ao autor    Encaminhar  
É necessário Acessar antes de postar mensagens.
Para postar uma mensagem você precisa primeiro participar deste grupo.
Atualize seu apelido na página de configurações da inscrição antes de postar.
Você não tem a permissão necessária para postar.
3.  Docky Wocky  
Ver perfil   Traduzir para Traduzido (ver original)
(1 usuário)  Mais opções 31 jul 2007, 17:55
Grupos de notícias: alt.politics.bush, alt.politics.british, us.military.navy, soc.culture.iranian, soc.culture.japan
De: "Docky Wocky" <mrch...@lst.net>
Data: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 20:55:58 GMT
Local: Ter 31 jul 2007 17:55
Assunto: Re: ZERO chance of Bush attacking Iran
blippo sez:

"How do you know what Bush thinks? They have plans drawn up for bombing
their reactors. It *might* be a bad idea, but how do you know Bush
knows that or thinks that? He is not a brilliant military mind, or the
type of guy who actually does thinking on his own..."
_____________________________
I think you think you know too much about Mr. Bush, Mr. Blippy.

I find him highly unpredictable, especially to the liberal minds - the vast
majority of which remains besotted and fixated on pie in the sky.

Looking back on his record, and the easy way Bush and his boys have
frustrated the livin' b'jesus out of the smartest of the Democratic
strategists sent to wage slime against him, it should be apparent by now
that the only weapon the libs have is hot air - and it sure is apparent to
the people, which explains the absolutely miserable numbers congresscritters
poll every day.

Now if there was only a way to adjust their pay and perk scales to follow
popularity polling, we would have the best of all worlds.

Depending on the activity of the liberal allies, aka, the bomb tossing wing
of al-Queda, Bush remains boss in spite of all the mud the liberal Democrats
sling; while congresscritters will never be able to rise above the group
label of cheap politician.

Putting your trust in polls is a foolish way to skin a cat, and  failing to
recognize that regular folks believe congress is only slightly more
trustworthy than the Taliban could be costly.

After all, in spite of all the posturing, Barack O'Bama and Hillary
(Herself) could end up like most of these people, clawing for a favored spot
on the scrap heap of history and sucking on the public teat forever.

However, it remains for the gods to make those decisions, not us mere
mortals.


    Responder ao autor    Encaminhar  
É necessário Acessar antes de postar mensagens.
Para postar uma mensagem você precisa primeiro participar deste grupo.
Atualize seu apelido na página de configurações da inscrição antes de postar.
Você não tem a permissão necessária para postar.
4.  Baldin Lee Pramer  
Ver perfil   Traduzir para Traduzido (ver original)
 Mais opções 31 jul 2007, 19:49
Grupos de notícias: alt.politics.bush, alt.politics.british, us.military.navy, soc.culture.iranian, soc.culture.japan
De: Baldin Lee Pramer <baldinpra...@msn.com>
Data: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 15:49:33 -0700
Local: Ter 31 jul 2007 19:49
Assunto: Re: ZERO chance of Bush attacking Iran
On Jul 31, 2:55 pm, "Docky Wocky" <mrch...@lst.net> wrote:

> blippo sez:

> "How do you know what Bush thinks? They have plans drawn up for bombing
> their reactors. It *might* be a bad idea, but how do you know Bush
> knows that or thinks that? He is not a brilliant military mind, or the
> type of guy who actually does thinking on his own..."
> _____________________________
> I think you think you know too much about Mr. Bush, Mr. Blippy.

I know very well that the plans have been made on how to take out the
Iranian reactors, and I know Bush had little input. He has no
experience in this area.

> I find him highly unpredictable, especially to the liberal minds - the vast
> majority of which remains besotted and fixated on pie in the sky.

I find him quite predictable. When he has advisors to lean on, his
actions seem shrewd until he starts talking. Then it is apparent that
he is not the one in charge. When he makes decisions on his own, watch
out! Remember Harriet Myers?

> Looking back on his record, and the easy way Bush and his boys have
> frustrated the livin' b'jesus out of the smartest of the Democratic
> strategists sent to wage slime against him

The key here is "and his boys". He really would be helpless without
the help. Consider what happens every time he must think on his feet,
for instance:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B5xVRXLgLxw&mode=related&search=

Sorry, he is not the brilliant military commander that you wish he
was.

BLP


    Responder ao autor    Encaminhar  
É necessário Acessar antes de postar mensagens.
Para postar uma mensagem você precisa primeiro participar deste grupo.
Atualize seu apelido na página de configurações da inscrição antes de postar.
Você não tem a permissão necessária para postar.
5.  gyansor...@gmail.com  
Ver perfil   Traduzir para Traduzido (ver original)
 Mais opções 1 ago 2007, 07:09
Grupos de notícias: alt.politics.bush, alt.politics.british, us.military.navy, soc.culture.iranian, soc.culture.japan
De: gyansor...@gmail.com
Data: Wed, 01 Aug 2007 03:09:04 -0700
Local: Qua 1 ago 2007 07:09
Assunto: Re: ZERO chance of Bush attacking Iran
On Aug 1, 8:00 am, Baldin Lee Pramer <baldinpra...@msn.com> wrote:

or for that matter does any thinking at all..

    Responder ao autor    Encaminhar  
É necessário Acessar antes de postar mensagens.
Para postar uma mensagem você precisa primeiro participar deste grupo.
Atualize seu apelido na página de configurações da inscrição antes de postar.
Você não tem a permissão necessária para postar.
6.  bo_daci...@mactan.org  
Ver perfil   Traduzir para Traduzido (ver original)
 Mais opções 1 ago 2007, 17:07
Grupos de notícias: alt.politics.bush, alt.politics.british, us.military.navy, soc.culture.iranian, soc.culture.japan
De: bo_daci...@mactan.org
Data: Wed, 01 Aug 2007 20:07:50 GMT
Local: Qua 1 ago 2007 17:07
Assunto: Re: ZERO chance of Bush attacking Iran

The good administrator surrounds himself with people who can think --
There have been no more 9/11's.  Had we a democrat for president
instead of Bush we would have declared a "Frenchman's Victory" right
after 9/11 and your mama would be wearing a berka and hijab now.

    Responder ao autor    Encaminhar  
É necessário Acessar antes de postar mensagens.
Para postar uma mensagem você precisa primeiro participar deste grupo.
Atualize seu apelido na página de configurações da inscrição antes de postar.
Você não tem a permissão necessária para postar.
7.  ObamaOrHillary2008  
Ver perfil   Traduzir para Traduzido (ver original)
 Mais opções 3 ago 2007, 21:46
Grupos de notícias: alt.politics.bush, alt.politics.british, us.military.navy, soc.culture.iranian, soc.culture.japan
De: ObamaOrHillary2008 <jgra...@gmail.com>
Data: Fri, 03 Aug 2007 17:46:44 -0700
Local: Sex 3 ago 2007 21:46
Assunto: Re: ZERO chance of Bush attacking Iran
On Aug 1, 4:07 pm, bo_daci...@mactan.org wrote:

Actually, instead of 3000 American civilians being killed by another
911, he sent 3500 American soldiers to
be killed in their place (and another 20,000 injured with no health
benefits).  By "taking it to their soil", he moved
the fighting to Iraq, where a half a million civilians have been
killed, and millions more suffered.

The bottom line is, super capitalists are like the Sopranos, making
billions and living it up on blood money and people's
suffering.  Nothing we can do to stop them.  Funneling other
countries' oil for their fancy weaponry that dropps bombs on
civilians and make more billions.  Very sad.


    Responder ao autor    Encaminhar  
É necessário Acessar antes de postar mensagens.
Para postar uma mensagem você precisa primeiro participar deste grupo.
Atualize seu apelido na página de configurações da inscrição antes de postar.
Você não tem a permissão necessária para postar.
8.  bo_daci...@mactan.org  
Ver perfil   Traduzir para Traduzido (ver original)
 Mais opções 4 ago 2007, 23:02
Grupos de notícias: alt.politics.bush, alt.politics.british, us.military.navy, soc.culture.iranian, soc.culture.japan
De: bo_daci...@mactan.org
Data: Sun, 05 Aug 2007 02:02:08 GMT
Local: Sab 4 ago 2007 23:02
Assunto: Re: ZERO chance of Bush attacking Iran
On Fri, 03 Aug 2007 17:46:44 -0700, ObamaOrHillary2008

That's one of the strategies of war. Send you armed forces to fight
the enemy on his land so that your civilians don't have to fight them
on yours.

>(and another 20,000 injured with no health
>benefits).  

Anyone serving in the Armed Forces, regular, reserve or National guard
wound or injured in any way in a war zone is entitled to FREE medical
coverage by the Veterans Administration. Democrats lie a lot about
such things, Apparently you like the flavor of their Kool Aid.

>By "taking it to their soil", he moved
>the fighting to Iraq, where a half a million civilians have been
>killed, and millions more suffered.

Mostly murdered insurgents loyal to Saddam and Islamic terrorist put
in country by al Quada.

>The bottom line is, super capitalists are like the Sopranos, making
>billions and living it up on blood money and people's
>suffering.  Nothing we can do to stop them.  Funneling other
>countries' oil for their fancy weaponry that dropps bombs on
>civilians and make more billions.  Very sad.

So, you have an opinion. Join the crowd. You might find someone who
will listen to you. Don't bet your rent money on it though...

    Responder ao autor    Encaminhar  
É necessário Acessar antes de postar mensagens.
Para postar uma mensagem você precisa primeiro participar deste grupo.
Atualize seu apelido na página de configurações da inscrição antes de postar.
Você não tem a permissão necessária para postar.
9.  EFill4Zaggin  
Ver perfil   Traduzir para Traduzido (ver original)
 Mais opções 5 ago 2007, 06:41
Grupos de notícias: alt.politics.bush, alt.politics.british, us.military.navy, soc.culture.iranian, soc.culture.japan
De: EFill4Zaggin <EFill4Zag...@hotmail.com>
Data: Sun, 05 Aug 2007 10:41:09 +0100
Local: Dom 5 ago 2007 06:41
Assunto: Re: ZERO chance of Bush attacking Iran

On Sun, 05 Aug 2007 02:02:08 GMT, bo_daci...@mactan.org wrote:
>That's one of the strategies of war. Send you armed forces to fight
>the enemy on his land so that your civilians don't have to fight them
>on yours.

Except the application of the "strategy" was bloody stupid -  there
was never any chance that the U.S would have to fight Iraqi-trained
terrorists on U.S soil because Iraq didn't have any ties to Al-Qaida
nor did it have any WMD. The whole thing was a con.

    Responder ao autor    Encaminhar  
É necessário Acessar antes de postar mensagens.
Para postar uma mensagem você precisa primeiro participar deste grupo.
Atualize seu apelido na página de configurações da inscrição antes de postar.
Você não tem a permissão necessária para postar.
10.  bo_daci...@mactan.org  
Ver perfil   Traduzir para Traduzido (ver original)
 Mais opções 5 ago 2007, 20:27
Grupos de notícias: alt.politics.bush, alt.politics.british, us.military.navy, soc.culture.iranian, soc.culture.japan
De: bo_daci...@mactan.org
Data: Sun, 05 Aug 2007 23:27:08 GMT
Local: Dom 5 ago 2007 20:27
Assunto: Re: ZERO chance of Bush attacking Iran
On Sun, 05 Aug 2007 10:41:09 +0100, EFill4Zaggin

<EFill4Zag...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>On Sun, 05 Aug 2007 02:02:08 GMT, bo_daci...@mactan.org wrote:

>>That's one of the strategies of war. Send you armed forces to fight
>>the enemy on his land so that your civilians don't have to fight them
>>on yours.

>Except the application of the "strategy" was bloody stupid -  there
>was never any chance that the U.S would have to fight Iraqi-trained
>terrorists on U.S soil because Iraq didn't have any ties to Al-Qaida
>nor did it have any WMD. The whole thing was a con.

But al Qaida had and has a presence in every country on the borders of
Iraq and there is little doubt that Saddam would eventually allowed
them to use Iraq as a training and operating base. We are killing al
Qaida Terrorist there now along with rouge Iraqis and Iranians -- If
you want hunt turkeys you go where the turkeys are.

    Responder ao autor    Encaminhar  
É necessário Acessar antes de postar mensagens.
Para postar uma mensagem você precisa primeiro participar deste grupo.
Atualize seu apelido na página de configurações da inscrição antes de postar.
Você não tem a permissão necessária para postar.

Criar um grupo - Grupos do Google - Página inicial do Google - Termos de Uso - Política de Privacidade
©2009 Google