This Burns of the State Department is an apparent Jew who is after Iran for Israel as well
sinalizar
Mensagens 1 - 10 de 727 - Recolher todas
/groups/adfetch?adid=X7q-LRAAAAD2N3Wd6d0cjpkiteImkgSs
This Burns of the State Department is an apparent Jew who is after Iran for Israel as well  
O grupo no qual você está postando é um grupo da Usenet. As mensagens postadas neste grupo farão com que o seu e-mail fique visível para qualquer pessoa na internet.
Sua resposta não foi enviada.
Postagem publicada
 
De:
Para:
Cc:
Encaminhar para
Adicionar Cc | Adicionar Encaminhar para | Editar Assunto
Assunto:
Validação:
Com o objetivo de verificação, digite os caracteres que você vê na figura abaixo ou os números que ouvir ao clicar no ícone de acessibilidade. Ouça e digite os números que ouvir
 
1.  dontcowerfromthetr...@yahoo.com  
Ver perfil   Traduzir para Traduzido (ver original)
 Mais opções 1 dez 2005, 05:17
Grupos de notícias: sci.military.naval, us.military.navy, us.military.national-guard, us.military.army, alt.military
De: dontcowerfromthetr...@yahoo.com
Data: 30 Nov 2005 23:17:28 -0800
Local: Qui 1 dez 2005 05:17
Assunto: This Burns of the State Department is an apparent Jew who is after Iran for Israel as well
Subject: Re: Understanding Jewish Influence : Neoconservatism as a
Jewish Movement:

Bush is drunk from the JINSA/CSP/PNAC Neocon propaganda coming from six
blocks up the road from the White House at AEI (see the following
'Thinking about Neoconservatism' article):

http://www.vdare.com/misc/macdonald_neoconservatism.htm

Read this one as well when you have some time to:

http://www.theoccidentalquarterly.com/vol4no2/km-understandIII.html

This Burns of the State Department is an apparent Jew who is after Iran
for Israel as well

http://www.c-span.org/search/basic.asp?ResultStart=1&ResultCount=10&B...

Whose War (Israel's War)?:

http://www.amconmag.com/03_24_03/cover.html

http://nomorewarforisrael.blogspot.com

http://nogw.com/warforisrael.html

http://gorillaintheroom.blogspot.com


    Responder ao autor    Encaminhar  
É necessário Acessar antes de postar mensagens.
Para postar uma mensagem você precisa primeiro participar deste grupo.
Atualize seu apelido na página de configurações da inscrição antes de postar.
Você não tem a permissão necessária para postar.
Please help me for online political news survey! ($10 reward possible)  
1.  대경 김  
Ver perfil   Traduzir para Traduzido (ver original)
 Mais opções 1 dez 2005, 06:29
Grupos de notícias: us.military.army, us.military.national-guard, us.military.navy, us.military, alt.politics.correct
De: "대경 김" <daekyung1...@yahoo.com>
Data: 1 Dec 2005 00:29:50 -0800
Local: Qui 1 dez 2005 06:29
Assunto: Please help me for online political news survey! ($10 reward possible)
Hello!
My name is Daekyung (danny) Kim, a Ph.D. student studying journalism
and mass communication in Southern Illinois University at Carbondale. I
am emailing to ask you to do me a favor. I am now working on my
dissertation whose topic is about online news and want to gather
information about how and why Internet users are using news Web sites
for political information based on an online survey.

This online survey will approximately take 15-20 minutes to complete.
After collecting the data, I will draw to pick up 50 respondents among
those who complete this survey and each will be given $ 10 gift card.

Would you please spend some time to fill out this survey?
http://www.surveymonkey.com/s.asp?u=594061481532
(please click on the address, OR if not working, copy it into the URL
address)
Your experience will be very useful in understanding how politically
interested online users are using online news and the consequent effect
on traditional news media.

You can withdraw the survey at any time you want. All responses will be
kept confidential and only be used for academic purposes. This survey
has been reviewed and approved by the SIUC Human Subject Committee. So,
there are no questions that may identify personal information.

Thank you very much in advance for your cooperation. Please email me
back if you have further concerns or questions.


    Responder ao autor    Encaminhar  
É necessário Acessar antes de postar mensagens.
Para postar uma mensagem você precisa primeiro participar deste grupo.
Atualize seu apelido na página de configurações da inscrição antes de postar.
Você não tem a permissão necessária para postar.
Big Jewish US military advisor - advises "Impeach Bush + Iraq most foolish war in 2,014 years"  
2.  Topaz  
Ver perfil   Traduzir para Traduzido (ver original)
 Mais opções 2 dez 2005, 23:39
Grupos de notícias: us.military.army, us.military.national-guard, us.military.navy, us.military, alt.politics.correct
De: Topaz <mars1...@hotmail.com>
Data: Fri, 02 Dec 2005 19:39:26 -0600
Local: Sex 2 dez 2005 23:39
Assunto: Re: Big Jewish US military advisor - advises "Impeach Bush + Iraq most foolish war in 2,014 years"
On 30 Nov 2005 12:32:58 -0800, "wegona_bef...@yahoo.com"

<wegona_bef...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>There is a remarkable article in the latest issue of the American
>Jewish weekly, Forward. It calls for President Bush to be impeached and
>put on trial "for misleading the American people, and launching the
>most foolish war since Emperor Augustus in 9 BC sent his legions into
>Germany and lost them".

  America is ruled by the Jews and the Jews were the ones who started
the war. Bush is their puppet and bootlicker. Now that a lot of
Americans are dying for the Jew, the Jew wants to put all the blame on
Bush. The Jews got what they wanted, Saddam out of power with the
likelihood of installing another Jewish controlled government like the
one in the USA. If they can't get such a government they at least want
to pin everything on Bush as this Jew does.

http://www.nationalvanguard.org       http://www.natvan.com
http://www.thebirdman.org     http://www.RealNews247.com


    Responder ao autor    Encaminhar  
É necessário Acessar antes de postar mensagens.
Para postar uma mensagem você precisa primeiro participar deste grupo.
Atualize seu apelido na página de configurações da inscrição antes de postar.
Você não tem a permissão necessária para postar.
3.  ray  
Ver perfil   Traduzir para Traduzido (ver original)
 Mais opções 3 dez 2005, 00:08
Grupos de notícias: us.military.army, us.military.national-guard, us.military.navy, us.military, alt.politics.correct
De: ray <xxxray...@aol.com>
Data: Fri, 02 Dec 2005 21:08:19 -0500
Local: Sab 3 dez 2005 00:08
Assunto: Re: Big Jewish US military advisor - advises "Impeach Bush + Iraq most foolish war in 2,014 years"
In article <1jt1p11ji024qveibveonm9k866ldqi...@4ax.com>,

Lol.  Priceless.  So what you are saying here is that the Jews (a
minority in the USA) started this war using Bush, and now they turned
against Bush, yet, he continues this war with full knowledge that the
people he started this war for turned against him?  

And now that Bush realizes that the Jew pinned this war on him, he will
continue to instill a Jewish ran Government in Iraq?  This is Grand.

Tell me, I must know, what kind of medication do you take to come to
these conclusions--to create these plots?  Because if I could do what
you are doing, I would give Steven Speilburg a run for his money.  Of
course, that would be difficult because he's a Jew.


    Responder ao autor    Encaminhar  
É necessário Acessar antes de postar mensagens.
Para postar uma mensagem você precisa primeiro participar deste grupo.
Atualize seu apelido na página de configurações da inscrição antes de postar.
Você não tem a permissão necessária para postar.
4.  Topaz  
Ver perfil   Traduzir para Traduzido (ver original)
 Mais opções 4 dez 2005, 21:16
Grupos de notícias: us.military.army, us.military.national-guard, us.military.navy, us.military, alt.politics.correct
De: Topaz <mars1...@hotmail.com>
Data: Sun, 04 Dec 2005 17:16:24 -0600
Local: Dom 4 dez 2005 21:16
Assunto: Re: Re: Big Jewish US military advisor - advises "Impeach Bush + Iraq most foolish war in 2,014 years"

On Fri, 02 Dec 2005 21:08:19 -0500, ray <xxxray...@aol.com> wrote:

>Lol.  Priceless.  So what you are saying here is that the Jews (a
>minority in the USA) started this war using Bush,

 America is ruled by the Jews. That is why America is always involved
in the Middle East.

Liberating America From Israel

by Paul Findley

Nine-eleven would not have occurred if the U.S. government had refused
to help Israel humiliate and destroy Palestinian society. Few express
this conclusion publicly, but many believe it is the truth. I believe
the catastrophe could have been prevented if any U.S. president during
the past 35 years had had the courage and wisdom to suspend all U.S.
aid until Israel withdrew from the Arab land seized in the 1967
Arab-Israeli war.

The U.S. lobby for Israel is powerful and intimidating, but any
determined president-even President Bush this very day-could prevail
and win overwhelming public support for the suspension of aid by
laying these facts before the American people:

Israel's present government, like its predecessors, is determined to
annex the West Bank-biblical Judea and Samaria - so Israel will become
Greater Israel. Ultra-Orthodox Jews, who maintain a powerful role in
Israeli politics, believe the Jewish Messiah will not come until
Greater Israel is a reality. Although a minority in Israel, they are
committed, aggressive, and influential. Because of deep religious
conviction, they are determined to
prevent Palestinians from gaining statehood on any part of the West
Bank.

In its violent assaults on Palestinians, Israel uses the pretext of
eradicating terrorism, but its forces are actually engaged advancing
the territorial expansion just cited. Under the guise of
anti-terrorism, Israeli forces treat Palestinians worse than cattle.
With due process nowhere to be found, hundreds are detained for long
periods and most are tortured. Some are assassinated. Homes, orchards,
and business places are destroyed. Entire cities are kept under
intermittent curfew, some confinements lasting for
weeks. Injured or ill Palestinians needing emergency medical care are
routinely held at checkpoints for an hour or more. Many children are
undernourished. The West Bank and Gaza have become giant concentration
camps. None of this could have occurred without U.S. support. Perhaps
Israeli officials believe life will become so unbearable that most
Palestinians will eventually leave their ancestral homes.

Once beloved worldwide, the U.S. government finds itself reviled in
most countries because it provides unconditional support of Israeli
violations of the United Nations Charter, international law, and the
precepts of all major religious faiths.

How did the American people get into this fix?

Nine-eleven had its principal origin 35 years ago when Israel's U.S.
lobby began its unbroken success in stifling debate about the proper
U.S. role in the Arab-Israeli conflict and effectively concealed from
public awareness the fact that the U.S. government gives massive
uncritical support to Israel.

Thanks to the suffocating influence of Israel's U.S. lobby, open
discussion of the Arab-Israeli conflict has been non-existent in our
government all these years. I have firsthand knowledge, because I was
a member of the House of Representatives Foreign Affairs Committee in
June 1967 when Israeli military forces took control of the Golan
Heights, a part of Syria, as well as the Palestinian West Bank and
Gaza. I continued as a member for 16 years and to this day maintain a
close watch on Congress.

For 35 years, not a word has been expressed in that committee or in
either chamber of Congress that deserves to be called debate on Middle
East policy. No restrictive or limiting amendments on aid to Israel
have been offered for 20 years, and none of the few offered in
previous years received more than a handful of votes. On Capitol Hill,
criticism of Israel, even in private conversation, is all but
forbidden, treated as downright unpatriotic, if not anti-Semitic. The
continued absence of free speech was assured when those few who spoke
out-Senators Adlai Stevenson and Charles Percy, and Reps. Paul
"Pete" McCloskey, Cynthia McKinney, Earl Hilliard, and myself-were
defeated at the polls by candidates heavily financed by pro-Israel
forces.

As a result, legislation dealing with the Middle East has been heavily
biased in favor of Israel and against Palestinians and other Arabs
year after year. Home constituencies, misled by news coverage equally
lop-sided in Israel's favor, remain largely unaware that Congress
behaves as if it were a subcommittee of the Israeli parliament.

However, the bias is widely noted beyond America, where most news
media candidly cover Israel's conquest and generally excoriate
America's complicity and complacency. When President Bush welcomed
Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon, sometimes called the Butcher of
Beirut, as "my dear friend" and "a man of peace" after Israeli forces,
using U.S.-donated arms, completed their devastation of the West Bank
last spring, worldwide anger against American policy reached the
boiling point.

The fury should surprise no one who reads foreign newspapers or
listens to BBC. In several televised statements long before 9/11,
Osama bin Laden, believed by U.S. authorities to have masterminded
9/11, cited U.S. complicity in Israel's destruction of Palestinian
society as a principal complaint. Prominent foreigners, in and out of
government, express their opposition to U.S. policies with
unprecedented frequency and severity, especially since Bush announced
his determination to make war against Iraq.

The lobby's intimidation remains pervasive. It seems to reach every
government center and even houses of worship and revered institutions
of higher learning. It is highly effective in silencing the many U.S.
Jews who object to the lobby's tactics and Israel's brutality...

Today, a year after 9/11, President Bush has made no attempt to
redress grievances, or even to identify them. In fact, he has made the
scene far worse by supporting Israel's religious war against
Palestinians, an alliance that has intensified anti-American anger. He
seems oblivious to the fact that nearly two billion people worldwide
regard the plight of Palestinians as today's most important
foreign-policy challenge. No one in authority will admit a calamitous
reality that is skillfully shielded from the American people but
clearly recognized by most of the world: America suffered 9/11 and its
aftermath and may soon be at war with Iraq, mainly because U.S. policy
in the Middle East is made in Israel, not in Washington.

Israel is a scofflaw nation and should be treated as such. Instead of
helping Sharon intensify Palestinian misery, our president should
suspend all aid until Israel ends its occupation of Arab land Israel
seized in 1967. The suspension would force Sharon's compliance or lead
to his removal from office, as the Israeli electorate will not
tolerate a prime minister who is at odds with the White House.

If Bush needs an additional reason for doing the right thing, he can
justify the suspension as a matter of military necessity, an essential
step in winning international support for his war on terrorism. He can
cite a worthy precedent. When President Abraham Lincoln issued the
proclamation that freed only the slaves in states that were then in
rebellion, he make the restriction because of "military necessity."

If Bush suspends U.S. aid, he will liberate all Americans from long
years of bondage to Israel's misdeeds.

Mr. Paul Findley, who served as a Republican congressman from Illinois
for 22 years, is the author of 'They Dare to Speak Out' and a member
of the American Educational Trust's Foreign Relations Committee.

Also See:  http://www.stop-us-military-aid-to-israel.net/
           Citizens for Fair Legislation ALERT: NO NEW AID TO ISRAEL
http://sf.indymedia.org/news/2003/01/1556560.php
    Congressman Paul Findley: Liberating America From Israel
http://www.mediamonitors.net/findley2.html
    Pat Buchanan: Why Politicians Prefer Israel over American
Interest?
http://amconmag.com/01_13_03/buchanan7.html

    Israeli Minister - 'We've Become Barbarians'
http://rense.com/general33/become.htm
    Wales Politician Compares Apartheid Israel to Nazi Germany
http://icwales.icnetwork.co.uk/0100news/0200wales/page.cfm?objectid=1...
&method=full&siteid=50082
    Israel's image of liberal democracy takes a battering
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2003/01/04/wisr0...
Sheet=/news/2003/01/04/ixworld.html
    Israel Bans Christian Politician and Party from Election
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/1845530.stm
    Israel to Expel Christian Politician and non-Jewish Parties from
Knesset
http://www.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,3604,866348,00.html
    Row over Arabs' election ban
http://www.dailytelegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2003/01/01/....
xml&sSheet=/news/2003/01/01/ixnewstop.html

    How Americas Zionist controlled media spin the facts.
http://jerusalem.indymedia.org/news/2002/12/98414_comment.php
    American Media Controlled by Israeli Supporters
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=Eric+Alterman+MSNBC+Israel&hl=en&lr...
F-8&oe=UTF-8&selm=3caaa1d0_1%40news.tm.net.my&rnum=1
    The Myth of Barak's Generous Offer
http://fair.org/extra/0207/generous.html
           Direct Financial Cost of Israel to US: $1.6 trillion and
growing
http://www.csmonitor.com/2002/1209/p16s01-wmgn.html
    MAKING MERCHANDISE OUT OF THE PEOPLE OF GOD: SELLING THE UPCOMING
WAR IN
IRAQ  http://www.endtimesnetwork.com/m2_s1.html

           Zionism Unbound - Vidal Gored 16 Years Ago
http://www.rense.com/general32/unbound.htm
    'It's Time To Get Tough With Israel' - Patriotic US Army Brig
General
http://www.rense.com/general33/tough.htm
    Israel's Policy Of 'Covert Aggression'
http://www.rense.com/general31/ze.htm
    ISRAEL'S SACRED TERRORISM
...

mais »


    Responder ao autor    Encaminhar  
É necessário Acessar antes de postar mensagens.
Para postar uma mensagem você precisa primeiro participar deste grupo.
Atualize seu apelido na página de configurações da inscrição antes de postar.
Você não tem a permissão necessária para postar.
5.  ray  
Ver perfil   Traduzir para Traduzido (ver original)
 Mais opções 4 dez 2005, 23:13
Grupos de notícias: us.military.army, us.military.national-guard, us.military.navy, us.military, alt.politics.correct
De: ray <xxxray...@aol.com>
Data: Sun, 04 Dec 2005 20:13:26 -0500
Local: Dom 4 dez 2005 23:13
Assunto: Re: Big Jewish US military advisor - advises "Impeach Bush + Iraq most foolish war in 2,014 years"
In article <ott6p1phpi1jjisk07v9m989u9lv178...@4ax.com>,

Let's face facts, as far as Arafat was concerned, the only way to settle
with the Jews was to kill them all; there was no medium.  Therefore, the
only way the US could have satisfied the Arabs was to kill all the Jews
for them.  And of course, that would never happen.  

But regardless what happened in Israel, 911 was the result of Osamas
anger against the US for our presence in Saudi Arabia.  It had very
little if anything to do with the Palestinians.  

> The U.S. lobby for Israel is powerful and intimidating, but any
> determined president-even President Bush this very day-could prevail
> and win overwhelming public support for the suspension of aid by
> laying these facts before the American people:

Oh, that would be brilliant, cutting ties with one of the few friends we
have in the Middle East.

Really?  And what results are the terrorists hoping for by constantly
attacking the Jews, friendship?  Jews were forced to leave their homes
and that still isn't enough for the Palestinians.  

> Once beloved worldwide, the U.S. government finds itself reviled in
> most countries because it provides unconditional support of Israeli
> violations of the United Nations Charter, international law, and the
> precepts of all major religious faiths.

> How did the American people get into this fix?

> Nine-eleven had its principal origin 35 years ago when Israel's U.S.
> lobby began its unbroken success in stifling debate about the proper
> U.S. role in the Arab-Israeli conflict and effectively concealed from
> public awareness the fact that the U.S. government gives massive
> uncritical support to Israel.

Just Israel?  Tell me then, where did Arafat get all of his Billions
that he kept to himself?  

What you are resorting to here is Conspiracy.  What you are telling me
is that the American people side with Israel due to ignorance.  
Therefore, we should not believe the media, and instead, believe you?

Misdeeds?  These people built a wall around themselves just to keep the
Arabs away from them.  Or, was that just bias reporting as well?  

We have two groups of people here in conflict.  One can wipe out the
other in less than a week.  But for some reason, they never do.  If the
US were so in the pockets of Israel, this conflict would have been over
with long ago.  

In comparison, let's say that Cubans were terrorizing cities across the
United States--a conflict that has been going on for decades.  How long
do you think it would take for the Untied States to simply wipe out
Cuba?  

There is no doubt that America has strong ties with Israel, and why not?  
Would we not stick up for any of our allies?  

<snip>


    Responder ao autor    Encaminhar  
É necessário Acessar antes de postar mensagens.
Para postar uma mensagem você precisa primeiro participar deste grupo.
Atualize seu apelido na página de configurações da inscrição antes de postar.
Você não tem a permissão necessária para postar.
6.  Topaz  
Ver perfil   Traduzir para Traduzido (ver original)
 Mais opções 6 dez 2005, 01:04
Grupos de notícias: us.military.army, us.military.national-guard, us.military.navy, us.military, alt.politics.correct
De: Topaz <mars1...@hotmail.com>
Data: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 21:04:17 -0600
Local: Ter 6 dez 2005 01:04
Assunto: Re: Re: Big Jewish US military advisor - advises "Impeach Bush + Iraq most foolish war in 2,014 years"

On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 20:13:26 -0500, ray <xxxray...@aol.com> wrote:
>Let's face facts, as far as Arafat was concerned, the only way to settle
>with the Jews was to kill them all; there was no medium.  Therefore, the
>only way the US could have satisfied the Arabs was to kill all the Jews
>for them.  And of course, that would never happen.  

  Jews are not just the enemies of Arabs. Jews are the enemies of
Whites as well:

"I will quote to you from the most popular web site in all of Israel.
It is called Gamla News and Views. It is a very extensive site in both
English and Hebrew. You can check it out for yourself. It was
instrumental in the 1996 elections in Israel, which brought the Likud
and Netanyahu to power. It has articles in Hebrew and English.
Usually, articles in all Hebrew newspapers are far more vehement
against Gentiles than those they translate into English. But, the
following article appears on their site and is written by their most
popular commentator Emanuel Winston, and it is in English. You can go
to Gamla and read this entire article for yourself.

"Winston Mideast Analysis & Commentary: The Crack of the Whip", in
Gamla,
News & Views (www.gamla.org.il), September 16, 1998.

http://www.gamla.org.il/english/article/1998/sept/win3.htm

Here's what this popular Jewish supremacist has to say about Europeans
and it should be made clear that the author makes clear that what he
calls Europeans are those of European descent, including Americans.
Quote:

"As any prostitute can tell you, for a fee they will agree to do
anything you want. The Europeans are really a low, immoral people who
would sell their mother... and then deliver.

".How easily any sense of humanity of civilization slips away from
their face, leaving only the beast. This beast has many faces and
names. Sometimes they are called Germans, Poles, Croatians,
Ukrainians... While at other times they became the Church, the Red
Cross, or Prime Ministers, Kings, Fuhrer. Then, in a quick change, we
see some Americans, French, English and, finally, there is the
contaminated Jew called the Leftist. It doesn't really matter, this
name or that. Underneath there is strand, a bond that society
teaches children to hate the "other" - the different ones."

Here is this obscenely hateful Jew calling Europeans prostitutes and
beasts and then in the height of hypocrisy saying that Europeans teach
children to hate the "other", the different ones, which, of course, he
means to be Jews. The truth is that the very core of Judaism teaches
hatred of Gentiles.

Then Winston goes on to cheer the genocide of the European people.
Quote:

"These are people of ultimate evil as the beast stays just below the
surface, ready to savage, ready to kill the Jew. The planet would be
well rid of the European predator. Perhaps we will be fortunate to
live in such interesting times (an old Chinese curse), to see the
decline and disappearance of the graveyard called Europe. The
Europeans, the English and the American Arabists once again come
together and crack the whip over the
Jews."

Now, again, let me repeat, this is the top web site in Israel,
supported by major Jewish political figures such as Benjamin
Netanyahu. He calls for the ridding of the planet of the European
people. The article is nothing less than a call for genocide.

Imagine for a minute if any major person in American called Jews
prostitutes and beasts and said, quote:

"The planet would be well rid of the Jewish predator. Perhaps we will
be fortunate to live in such interesting times, to see the decline and
disappearance of the graveyard called the Jewish people and Israel."

Could you imagine the outcry if any Christian made such a statement
about Jews? In most countries of Europe they would be placed in jail.
Even American activists who have simply criticized Jews much more
mildly have been put in jail, when they have touched down on European
soil, such as in Germany. Do you think Mr. Emanuel Winston faces that
possibility? Don't hold your breath.

And, in this very article, this paranoid Jewish supremacist accuses
the very same nations who have unconditionally supported Israel and
all of its evil, as hating Jews! As he calls us beasts and prostitutes
and wishes for our genocide, he then says that WE are the ones
hateful.

That is 14-carat Jewish supremacist hypocrisy and the western world is
filled with it.

If you don't believe what you have just heard, please go to the Gamla
site in Israel and read Winston's article for yourself!

Of course, Jewish supremacists such as Winston are already working for
the demise of Europeans just as they have worked for the destruction
of the Palestinians. Jewish supremacists in every nation of Europe and
in America have relentlessly led the effort to open the borders and
make Europeans a small minority in our own nations. This is at the
same time they make immigration to Israel dependent on race. They have
consciously led the effort to wipe out our heritage and culture and
even existence. They are the ultimate racial supremacists, the
ultimate haters and, of course, the ultimate hypocrites.

And they have the Chutzpah to make the false claim that I am a White
supremacist. In truth, I don't want to be supreme over any other
people; I am not a supremacist: I am really just a preservationist: I
just want my heritage and traditions to continue in our own European
and American homelands. Whereas Jewish supremacists fulfill the true
definition of supremacism, that is to be supreme over other peoples.
Jewish Supremacists
want control over every land, every government, every media. They want
total Supremacy. They are the real supremacists, and they are the real
haters, and they are the ultimate hypocrites!

And we must, if we love freedom, if we love our heritage, oppose them
with every ounce of our being, even with our very lives. The time is
now.

This has been David Duke sharing my latest thoughts."

Listen online now at http://www.davidduke.com/radio

>But regardless what happened in Israel, 911 was the result of Osamas
>anger against the US for our presence in Saudi Arabia.  It had very
>little if anything to do with the Palestinians.  

Osama bin Laden
September 24th statement published in Pakistan

"I have already said that we are not hostile to the United States. We
are against the system, which makes other nations slaves of the United
States, or forces them to mortgage their political and economic
freedom. This system is totally in control of the American Jews, whose
first priority is Israel, not the United States. It is simply that the
American people are themselves the slaves of the Jews and are forced
to live according to the principles and laws laid by them. So, the
punishment should reach Israel. In fact, it
is Israel, which is giving a blood bath to innocent Muslims and the
U.S. is not uttering a single word."

>Oh, that would be brilliant, cutting ties with one of the few friends we
>have in the Middle East.

  The Jewish controlled media says the Jews are America's only friends
in the Middle East. The truth is that before the Jews America didn't
have any enemies in the Middle East.

>Really?  And what results are the terrorists hoping for by constantly
>attacking the Jews, friendship?  Jews were forced to leave their homes
>and that still isn't enough for the Palestinians.  

Sharon Grabs More West Bank Land Than He Returned in Gaza
By Chris McGreal

...these de facto border posts are just one element in a web of
construction evidently intended to redraw Israel's borders deep inside
the Palestinian territories and secure all of Jerusalem as Israel's
capital, and to do it fast so as to put the whole issue beyond
negotiation. As foreign leaders, including Tony Blair, praised Mr
Sharon for his "courage" in pulling out of Gaza last month, Israel was
accelerating construction of the West Bank barrier, expropriating more
land in the West Bank than it was surrendering in Gaza, and building
thousands of new homes in Jewish settlements. At the core of the
strategy is the 420-mile West Bank barrier which many Israeli
politicians regard as marking out a future border. Its route carves
out large areas for expansion of the main Jewish settlements of Ariel,
Maale Adumim and Gush Etzion, and expropriates swaths of Palestinian
land by separating it from its owners.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/frontpage/story/0,16518,1594808,00.html

>Just Israel?  Tell me then, where did Arafat get all of his Billions
>that he kept to himself?  

 Jews are our enemy.

"I ask you to consider the following:
Imagine if the rulers of a Mideast nation such as Syria, and I am not
simply speaking about a gang of radicals in that nation, but the
actual government ministers of this Mideast nation, launched terrorist
attacks against American civilian installations.
Imagine if the Syrian Government sent terrorists into Egypt to
firebomb American theaters and libraries and treacherously plotted to
blame the attacks on Egypt so that the United States would go to war
against that nation.
If successful, the treacherous plan would harm America even more than
the terrorist attacks themselves, because even more American blood and
treasure would be spilled in a devastating war on an innocent nation!
Imagine that the premature explosion of the one of the Syrian agent's
bombs led to the capture of all the Syrian operatives and ultimately
caused a complete exposure of Syria's terrorism against America.
In fact, imagine that the failed plot became so exposed that the
Syrian Defense minister had to resign.
How do you think the United States would respond to these acts of
terrorism committed against Americans by the Syrian government?
Would not at the very least America make military strikes at Syrian
installations?
Remember, that without Iraq committing even a single warlike act
against the United States, America invaded Iraq and spent hundreds of
billions of dollars and suffered great numbers
...

mais »


    Responder ao autor    Encaminhar  
É necessário Acessar antes de postar mensagens.
Para postar uma mensagem você precisa primeiro participar deste grupo.
Atualize seu apelido na página de configurações da inscrição antes de postar.
Você não tem a permissão necessária para postar.
7.  ray  
Ver perfil   Traduzir para Traduzido (ver original)
 Mais opções 7 dez 2005, 00:05
Grupos de notícias: us.military.army, us.military.national-guard, us.military.navy, us.military, alt.politics.correct
De: ray <xxxray...@aol.com>
Data: Tue, 06 Dec 2005 21:05:33 -0500
Local: Qua 7 dez 2005 00:05
Assunto: Re: Big Jewish US military advisor - advises "Impeach Bush + Iraq most foolish war in 2,014 years"
In article <ccv9p1tnemt4paev1k87mvaafp3ormh...@4ax.com>,

<snip>

What you are talking about here are extremists available in just about
any culture.  In the United States, we have Nazi rallies.  We have KKK
rallies.  We have bombings of Abortion Clinics and assaults on Doctors
and Nurses involved in Abortions.  But these people are not the epitome
of the people they claim to represent.  

In other words, you can examine any culture, any religion or any race
and find people who have or share a opinion just like this.  We can't
stereotype all Catholic Priests as child molesters.  We can't form an
opinion of our Financial Market based on Enron.  We can't stereotype
police officers because of Rodney King.  We can't accuse all Black
people of murder, rape and theft.  

Yet in this brilliant statement, he fails to prove or provide the
reasoning behind his conclusion.  The United States is basically a
Christian/Catholic Nation.  The Jewish population in the US is
considered a minority, and their influence hardly gives them the
availability or resource to control the strongest country in the entire
world.  

It is true that Jews run businesses, are in control of the Left Wing
Hollywood industry and even have a stronghold of the legal market.  But
they do not have a population in this country to reenforce radical
beliefs.  After all, name the last American President that was Jewish!  

It's no secret that Osama was a radical himself.  Therefore, any
statement he makes can only be recognized as that of a mad man; that of
a radical.

> >Oh, that would be brilliant, cutting ties with one of the few friends we
> >have in the Middle East.

>   The Jewish controlled media says the Jews are America's only friends
> in the Middle East. The truth is that before the Jews America didn't
> have any enemies in the Middle East.

Please.  Saudi Arabia and Kuwait are friends of the US and in fact, held
ground against OPEC when they announced plans to decrease oil
production.  I have never heard one statement by Jews or anybody else
that Israel was our only true friend in the Middle East.  In fact, Saudi
Arabia has closer ties to the US than Israel.

Then the question here is, who initiated this action?  The Jews?

That depends on who is President at the time--Democrat or Republican.  
But if there were retaliation, it would not be against any certain
target, it would be against the country.

...

mais »


    Responder ao autor    Encaminhar  
É necessário Acessar antes de postar mensagens.
Para postar uma mensagem você precisa primeiro participar deste grupo.
Atualize seu apelido na página de configurações da inscrição antes de postar.
Você não tem a permissão necessária para postar.
Murtha Says Army Is 'Broken, Worn Out'  
1.  dontcowerfromthetr...@yahoo.com  
Ver perfil   Traduzir para Traduzido (ver original)
 Mais opções 1 dez 2005, 15:19
Grupos de notícias: sci.military.naval, us.military.army, us.military.national-guard, us.military.navy, alt.military
De: dontcowerfromthetr...@yahoo.com
Data: 1 Dec 2005 09:19:02 -0800
Local: Qui 1 dez 2005 15:19
Assunto: Murtha Says Army Is 'Broken, Worn Out'
Murtha Says Army Is 'Broken, Worn Out'

1 hour, 46 minutes ago

Most U.S. troops will leave Iraq within a year because the Army is
"broken, worn out" and "living hand to mouth," Rep. John Murtha (news,
bio, voting record) told a civic group.

Two weeks ago, Murtha created a storm of comment when he called for
U.S. troops to leave Iraq now. The Democratic congressman spoke to a
group of community and business leaders in Latrobe on Wednesday, the
same day President Bush said troops would be withdrawn when they've
achieved victory, not under an artificial deadline set by politicians.

Murtha predicted most troops will be out of Iraq within a year.

"I predict he'll make it look like we're staying the course," Murtha
said, referring to Bush. "Staying the course is not a policy."

Murtha, 73, the ranking Democrat on the House Appropriations defense
subcommittee, expressed pessimism about Iraq's stability and said the
Iraqis know who the insurgents are, but don't always share that
information with U.S. troops. He said a civil war is likely because of
ongoing factionalism among Sunni Arabs, and Kurds and Shiites.

He also said he was wrong to vote to support the war.

"I admit I made a mistake when I voted for war," Murtha said. "I'm
looking at the future of the United States military."

Murtha, a decorated Vietnam war veteran, said the Pennsylvania National
Guard is "stretched so thin" that it won't be able to send fully
equipped units to Iraq next year. Murtha predicted it will cost $50
billion to upgrade military equipment nationwide, but says the federal
government is already reducing future purchases to save money.

Murtha, who represents a western Pennsylvania district that includes
Latrobe, was first elected to Congress in 1974.

Lt. Col. Chris Cleaver, spokesman for the Pennsylvania National Guard
at Fort Indiantown Gap, said "there are some deployment concerns."

Cleaver said some guard units had to leave equipment in Iraq when they
returned to the United States, which could cause training problems
here.

But Cleaver also said most of the 2,100 Guard troops now deployed with
the 2nd Brigade Combat Team can't be sent back to Iraq for a second
tour of duty anyway, because of regulations that limit redeployment.

Whose War (Israel's War)?:

http://www.amconmag.com/03_24_03/cover.html

http://www.nowarforisrael.com

http://www.nogw.com/warforisrael.html

http://gorillaintheroom.blogspot.com

http://nomorewarforisrael.blogspot.com


    Responder ao autor    Encaminhar  
É necessário Acessar antes de postar mensagens.
Para postar uma mensagem você precisa primeiro participar deste grupo.
Atualize seu apelido na página de configurações da inscrição antes de postar.
Você não tem a permissão necessária para postar.
2.  Mark Test  
Ver perfil   Traduzir para Traduzido (ver original)
 Mais opções 2 dez 2005, 02:11
Grupos de notícias: sci.military.naval, us.military.army, us.military.national-guard, us.military.navy, alt.military
De: "Mark Test" <MARK...@peoplepc.com>
Data: Fri, 02 Dec 2005 04:11:36 GMT
Local: Sex 2 dez 2005 02:11
Assunto: Re: Murtha Says Army Is 'Broken, Worn Out'
<dontcowerfromthetr...@yahoo.com> wrote in message

news:1133457542.647384.101230@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> Murtha Says Army Is 'Broken, Worn Out'

> 1 hour, 46 minutes ago

> Most U.S. troops will leave Iraq within a year because the Army is
> "broken, worn out" and "living hand to mouth," Rep. John Murtha (news,
> bio, voting record) told a civic group.

How can an Army (let alone the US Army) be "broken"?  The man is
an idiot.

    Responder ao autor    Encaminhar  
É necessário Acessar antes de postar mensagens.
Para postar uma mensagem você precisa primeiro participar deste grupo.
Atualize seu apelido na página de configurações da inscrição antes de postar.
Você não tem a permissão necessária para postar.

Criar um grupo - Grupos do Google - Página inicial do Google - Termos de Uso - Política de Privacidade
©2009 Google