> On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 16:52:22 GMT, slim <picki...@nyc.rr.com> wrote:

> >Phil wrote:

> >> On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 04:27:38 GMT, slim <picki...@nyc.rr.com> wrote:

> >> >liberty_or_death wrote:

> >> >> It shouldn't, considering how kids these days are spoon-fed radical far-left
> >> >> hate-America bullshit from the time they enter kindergarten.  Small wonder
> >> >> that so many good teachers quit in disgust and start new careers as
> >> >> something else ===

> >> >WOMD FOUND TO DATE =  ZERO.

> >> >TENS OF THOUSANDS INNOCENT IRAQI DEAD.

> >> >Kids don't like to be lied to.

> >> Neither do adults, Mike.

> >> Remember the missiles found with mustard gas?  I told you about them
> >> several times.

> >Yeah, those rusted-out bottle rockets were a threat to America.

> Mustard gas is one of the most potent chemical weapons, even by
> today's standards.  Funny how you're willing to make light of it  How
> many tens of thousands of people could those missiles have killed?

>Phil wrote:

>> On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 16:52:22 GMT, slim <picki...@nyc.rr.com> wrote:

>> >Phil wrote:

>> >> On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 04:27:38 GMT, slim <picki...@nyc.rr.com> wrote:

>> >> >liberty_or_death wrote:

>> >> >> It shouldn't, considering how kids these days are spoon-fed radical far-left
>> >> >> hate-America bullshit from the time they enter kindergarten.  Small wonder
>> >> >> that so many good teachers quit in disgust and start new careers as
>> >> >> something else ===

>> >> >WOMD FOUND TO DATE =  ZERO.

>> >> >TENS OF THOUSANDS INNOCENT IRAQI DEAD.

>> >> >Kids don't like to be lied to.

>> >> Neither do adults, Mike.

>> >> Remember the missiles found with mustard gas?  I told you about them
>> >> several times.

>> >Yeah, those rusted-out bottle rockets were a threat to America.

>> Mustard gas is one of the most potent chemical weapons, even by
>> today's standards.  Funny how you're willing to make light of it  How
>> many tens of thousands of people could those missiles have killed?

>Yeah, Phil...HOW MANY could have been killed?

>There was very little gas found as I recall.

> On Tue, 01 Mar 2005 16:22:34 GMT, slim <picki...@nyc.rr.com> wrote:

> >Phil wrote:

> >> On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 16:52:22 GMT, slim <picki...@nyc.rr.com> wrote:

> >> >Phil wrote:

> >> >> On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 04:27:38 GMT, slim <picki...@nyc.rr.com> wrote:

> >> >> >liberty_or_death wrote:

> >> >> >> It shouldn't, considering how kids these days are spoon-fed radical far-left
> >> >> >> hate-America bullshit from the time they enter kindergarten.  Small wonder
> >> >> >> that so many good teachers quit in disgust and start new careers as
> >> >> >> something else ===

> >> >> >WOMD FOUND TO DATE =  ZERO.

> >> >> >TENS OF THOUSANDS INNOCENT IRAQI DEAD.

> >> >> >Kids don't like to be lied to.

> >> >> Neither do adults, Mike.

> >> >> Remember the missiles found with mustard gas?  I told you about them
> >> >> several times.

> >> >Yeah, those rusted-out bottle rockets were a threat to America.

> >> Mustard gas is one of the most potent chemical weapons, even by
> >> today's standards.  Funny how you're willing to make light of it  How
> >> many tens of thousands of people could those missiles have killed?

> >Yeah, Phil...HOW MANY could have been killed?

> >There was very little gas found as I recall.

> You don't recall shit, Mike, unless it involves annoying others.

> Can you cite a source for how much was found?

> I didn't think so.

>> >> >> >TENS OF THOUSANDS INNOCENT IRAQI DEAD.

>> >> >> >Kids don't like to be lied to.

>> >> >> Neither do adults, Mike.

>> >> >> Remember the missiles found with mustard gas?  I told you about them
>> >> >> several times.

>> >> >Yeah, those rusted-out bottle rockets were a threat to America.

>> >> Mustard gas is one of the most potent chemical weapons, even by
>> >> today's standards.  Funny how you're willing to make light of it  How
>> >> many tens of thousands of people could those missiles have killed?

>> >Yeah, Phil...HOW MANY could have been killed?

>> >There was very little gas found as I recall.

>> You don't recall shit, Mike, unless it involves annoying others.

>> Can you cite a source for how much was found?

>> I didn't think so.

>Excuse me, you drunken asshole.

>It was ONE shell with Mustard gas.

>http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,120137,00.html

>From FUXXXnooz.

> On Wed, 02 Mar 2005 04:42:44 GMT, slim <picki...@nyc.rr.com> wrote:

> >> >> >> >WOMD FOUND TO DATE =  ZERO.

> >> >> >> >TENS OF THOUSANDS INNOCENT IRAQI DEAD.

> >> >> >> >Kids don't like to be lied to.

> >> >> >> Neither do adults, Mike.

> >> >> >> Remember the missiles found with mustard gas?  I told you about them
> >> >> >> several times.

> >> >> >Yeah, those rusted-out bottle rockets were a threat to America.

> >> >> Mustard gas is one of the most potent chemical weapons, even by
> >> >> today's standards.  Funny how you're willing to make light of it  How
> >> >> many tens of thousands of people could those missiles have killed?

> >> >Yeah, Phil...HOW MANY could have been killed?

> >> >There was very little gas found as I recall.

> >> You don't recall shit, Mike, unless it involves annoying others.

> >> Can you cite a source for how much was found?

> >> I didn't think so.

> >Excuse me, you drunken asshole.

> >It was ONE shell with Mustard gas.

> >http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,120137,00.html

> >From FUXXXnooz.

> From CNN:

>  http://www.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/meast/02/12/sprj.irq.inspections/

> You cite a story from May 2004.  I'm citing a story from February
> 2003.  Two separate incidences fifteen months apart.

> I guess you can't keep facts straight even when they're handed to you.

> I'm sure that, despite two separate incidences of chemical weapons
> founds, you'll still sing 'WOMD = 0.'  After all, why should you start
> telling the truth now?

>> >Excuse me, you drunken asshole.

>> >It was ONE shell with Mustard gas.

>> >http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,120137,00.html

>> >From FUXXXnooz.

>> From CNN:

>>  http://www.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/meast/02/12/sprj.irq.inspections/

>> You cite a story from May 2004.  I'm citing a story from February
>> 2003.  Two separate incidences fifteen months apart.

>> I guess you can't keep facts straight even when they're handed to you.

>> I'm sure that, despite two separate incidences of chemical weapons
>> founds, you'll still sing 'WOMD = 0.'  After all, why should you start
>> telling the truth now?

>Ten artillery shells.

>Hardly a threat to America.
>Hardly a reason to Invade and Occupy.

> On Wed, 02 Mar 2005 15:14:38 GMT, slim <picki...@nyc.rr.com> wrote:

> >> >Excuse me, you drunken asshole.

> >> >It was ONE shell with Mustard gas.

> >> >http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,120137,00.html

> >> >From FUXXXnooz.

> >> From CNN:

> >>  http://www.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/meast/02/12/sprj.irq.inspections/

> >> You cite a story from May 2004.  I'm citing a story from February
> >> 2003.  Two separate incidences fifteen months apart.

> >> I guess you can't keep facts straight even when they're handed to you.

> >> I'm sure that, despite two separate incidences of chemical weapons
> >> founds, you'll still sing 'WOMD = 0.'  After all, why should you start
> >> telling the truth now?

> >Ten artillery shells.

> >Hardly a threat to America.
> >Hardly a reason to Invade and Occupy.

> Each day I think you couldn't possibly make yourself look like a
> bigger asshole....

> and then I read your next post.

> In article <5qc721te8uhjhcl1v6dj8qg22e6i2ta...@4ax.com>,
> doggl...@yahoooo.com says...

> > >Yeah, those rusted-out bottle rockets were a threat to America.

> > Mustard gas is one of the most potent chemical weapons, even by
> > today's standards.  Funny how you're willing to make light of it  How
> > many tens of thousands of people could those missiles have killed?

> Considering that there were about 3 of them and they were 15 years old,
> the answer is, "not many".

> On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 19:25:14 -0500, spammersmust...@volcanomail.com
> (Jeffrey Salzberg) wrote:

> >In article <5qc721te8uhjhcl1v6dj8qg22e6i2ta...@4ax.com>,
> >doggl...@yahoooo.com says...

> >> >Yeah, those rusted-out bottle rockets were a threat to America.

> >> Mustard gas is one of the most potent chemical weapons, even by
> >> today's standards.  Funny how you're willing to make light of it  How
> >> many tens of thousands of people could those missiles have killed?

> >Considering that there were about 3 of them and they were 15 years old,
> >the answer is, "not many".

> There were ten of them, not three.  And mustard gas has a long shelf
> life:

> http://www.stevequayle.com/News.alert/03_Global/030226.Iraqi.defector...

> "Similarly, Iraq initially told UNSCOM that it had produced 3,080 tons
> of mustard gas, but in 1995 the regime reduced that figure to 2,850
> tons. UNSCOM reported Iraq's mustard gas to be at least 80 percent
> pure and determined that it could be stored for long periods of time,
> both in bulk and in weaponized form. Experts state that in its
> distilled form, mustard gas has a long life, can be stockpiled for
> decades, and is relatively easy to produce and load into munitions.
> Iraq admitted filling approximately 550 artillery shells with mustard
> gas but says it misplaced them shortly after the Gulf War. "