New man on board
sinalizar
Mensagens 1 - 10 de 4997 - Recolher todas
/groups/adfetch?adid=PbBpHhIAAAD_lAP0SPX8Vjm40d_5S3O4xyxpo7bMRVgpn9ZMKisPfQ
New man on board  
O grupo no qual você está postando é um grupo da Usenet. As mensagens postadas neste grupo farão com que o seu e-mail fique visível para qualquer pessoa na internet.
Sua resposta não foi enviada.
Postagem publicada
 
De:
Para:
Cc:
Encaminhar para
Adicionar Cc | Adicionar Encaminhar para | Editar Assunto
Assunto:
Validação:
Com o objetivo de verificação, digite os caracteres que você vê na figura abaixo ou os números que ouvir ao clicar no ícone de acessibilidade. Ouça e digite os números que ouvir
 
1.  K1374  
Ver perfil   Traduzir para Traduzido (ver original)
 Mais opções 1 set 1998, 04:00
Grupos de notícias: sci.military.naval
De: k1...@aol.com (K1374)
Data: 1998/09/01
Assunto: Re: New man on board
Mouth shut, ears open, eyes front.  I still think back from time to time about
boot camp at great mistakes....they are good memories.  I met alot of really
good friends there that, believe it or not, after 17 years I still talk to.
GMGC Dennis Dayton, if you're out there, thanks for the direction.    Good
luck, mate!

    Responder ao autor    Encaminhar  
É necessário Acessar antes de postar mensagens.
Para postar uma mensagem você precisa primeiro participar deste grupo.
Atualize seu apelido na página de configurações da inscrição antes de postar.
Você não tem a permissão necessária para postar.
2.  BlackBeard  
Ver perfil   Traduzir para Traduzido (ver original)
 Mais opções 1 set 1998, 04:00
Grupos de notícias: sci.military.naval
De: nos...@yadda.yadda.yadda (BlackBeard)
Data: 1998/09/01
Assunto: Re: New man on board
In article <1998090102433400.WAA21...@ladder01.news.aol.com>,

k1...@aol.com (K1374) wrote:
>Mouth shut, ears open, eyes front.  I still think back from time to time about

I believe that's mouth open, ears shut, eyes front.  He did say he was
going to be an intern at the whitehouse .. right?

BlackBeard
Submarines once, Submarines twice...
Trying to reason with hurricane season, in the Mojave desert.


    Responder ao autor    Encaminhar  
É necessário Acessar antes de postar mensagens.
Para postar uma mensagem você precisa primeiro participar deste grupo.
Atualize seu apelido na página de configurações da inscrição antes de postar.
Você não tem a permissão necessária para postar.
Submarine communications  
1.  Matthias Warkus  
Ver perfil   Traduzir para Traduzido (ver original)
 Mais opções 1 set 1998, 04:00
Grupos de notícias: sci.military.naval
De: mawar...@t-online.de (Matthias Warkus)
Data: 1998/09/01
Assunto: Submarine communications
I hope I don't look silly as a newbie on this group, but nevertheless
here we go.

As far as I can see, submerged submarines normally operate alone since
they can't communicate with each other (well, the only way would be
underwater telephony which gives a gratuitious acoustic signature).
Would it be an advantage if there was some means of communication?

mawa
--
mailto:m...@iname.com | http://www.angelfire.com/ny/mawaspace/ | 42
Get a Cold Feet Experience... Get Acme Frob Coil Oil! | Barf now...
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GAT/U d-(--) s:- a--- C++(++++)>$ P+(--) L++>++++>$ E++>+++ W++(-) N++
o? K w---(+) >M+ V-- PS+(++) PE(-)(--) Y+>++ >PGP++ t+(---)@ 5>+ X-@

>R+++@ tv(+) b+++(++++)>$ >DI+ D(--)(---) G++ e@(*)>++++ h! !y+

------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------

    Responder ao autor    Encaminhar  
É necessário Acessar antes de postar mensagens.
Para postar uma mensagem você precisa primeiro participar deste grupo.
Atualize seu apelido na página de configurações da inscrição antes de postar.
Você não tem a permissão necessária para postar.
2.  Erik van Bronkhorst  
Ver perfil   Traduzir para Traduzido (ver original)
 Mais opções 1 set 1998, 04:00
Grupos de notícias: sci.military.naval
De: Erik van Bronkhorst <zip...@ridgenet.net>
Data: 1998/09/01
Assunto: Re: Submarine communications
Heavens, there are other ways of transmitting information besides
acoustic waves!  What about VLF, or blue-green laser...  I don't
think the subs are intended or needed to function in groups these days
so it would probably be of little importance.

--
Erik van Bronkhorst
kc6...@qsl.net
www.qsl.net/kc6uut/
www.ridgenet.net/~caseycct/erik/

"One thing I have learned in a long life: that all our science,
measured against reality, is primitive and childlike – and yet
it is the most precious thing we have."
                                      -- A. Einstein


    Responder ao autor    Encaminhar  
É necessário Acessar antes de postar mensagens.
Para postar uma mensagem você precisa primeiro participar deste grupo.
Atualize seu apelido na página de configurações da inscrição antes de postar.
Você não tem a permissão necessária para postar.
Why terrorists use nuclear weapons  
1.  Per Andersson  
Ver perfil   Traduzir para Traduzido (ver original)
 Mais opções 1 set 1998, 04:00
Grupos de notícias: sci.military.naval
De: pant...@mbox303.swipnet.se (Per Andersson)
Data: 1998/09/01
Assunto: Re: Why terrorists use nuclear weapons

Richard Hutchinson <rhu...@home.com> wrote:
>My favorite question: Do you have any drugs or firearms?  I wonder how
>many people have ever answered yes.

On the form us foreigners get to sign I really like the "are you a
Nazi war-criminal?" question...

Though the "are you an international terrorist" bit isn't bad
either...

Per Andersson

"Some kind of central planning seems to be  the object of
 most environmental activists. But why is a Politburo expected
 to work better for plants and animals than it did for Russians?"


    Responder ao autor    Encaminhar  
É necessário Acessar antes de postar mensagens.
Para postar uma mensagem você precisa primeiro participar deste grupo.
Atualize seu apelido na página de configurações da inscrição antes de postar.
Você não tem a permissão necessária para postar.
2.  Per Andersson  
Ver perfil   Traduzir para Traduzido (ver original)
 Mais opções 1 set 1998, 04:00
Grupos de notícias: sci.military.naval
De: pant...@mbox303.swipnet.se (Per Andersson)
Data: 1998/09/01
Assunto: Re: Why terrorists use nuclear weapons

Ali Krav <lpjk...@concentric.net> wrote:
>John M. Atkinson wrote:

(snip)

>> Oh.  That.  Well, when they observe the Geneva Conventions, I'll
>> rescind my statement.

>GENEVA IS DEAD.

Look, another savage.

Per Andersson

"Some kind of central planning seems to be  the object of
 most environmental activists. But why is a Politburo expected
 to work better for plants and animals than it did for Russians?"


    Responder ao autor    Encaminhar  
É necessário Acessar antes de postar mensagens.
Para postar uma mensagem você precisa primeiro participar deste grupo.
Atualize seu apelido na página de configurações da inscrição antes de postar.
Você não tem a permissão necessária para postar.
3.  Chuckg  
Ver perfil   Traduzir para Traduzido (ver original)
 Mais opções 1 set 1998, 04:00
Grupos de notícias: soc.culture.israel, alt.security.terrorism, sci.military.naval, rec.aviation.military, alt.books.tom-clancy, alt.fan.tom-clancy
De: "Chuckg" <cglas...@hotmail.com>
Data: 1998/09/01
Assunto: Re: Why terrorists use nuclear weapons

Along the Mexican border, it's an open secret that several thousand
bucks in the palm of the right US Customs man will get your truck waved
through the border checkpoint without their even looking at it.  Tons of
cocaine enter the country through that gaping security flaw every month.
(Don't ask me why the government isn't cleaning up that corrupt mess...
probably has something to do with the usual government tendency to not
want to listen to whistle-blowers.)

Any terrorist organization with even a modicum of street smarts could
easily get the info from the local Mexican smugglers on who is bribable
and who is not.  Then they just grease the right palm, and US Customs
lets a truck full of plutonium and/or nerve gas enter this country...
all the while thinking that the truck they let slip by was just another
common drug runner.

Hell, I don't even need to bribe the Customs guy... I just seal the
plutonium in the bed of the truck and drive on through. So they inspect
me.  So what?  That dog is trained to sniff out drugs, not plutonium.
He won't pick up a single thing.

<snip>

>Hmm..  There is still the problem of storage, transporting it(without
>irradiating the terrorists carrying the stuff),

Plutonium just sitting in a sealed jar in a subcritical mass is only
barely radioactive.  You can sit next to it for a week without picking
up anywhere near a harmful dose.  The main danger in handling raw
plutonium is that it is one of the most *chemically* toxic substances in
the world... but you can beat that with a simple airtight seal.

>and then assembling the bomb.  Could any competent Electrical Engineer
build
>a small Nuke with instructions ?  Yes, hell I think that Phrack
magazine published
>some such plans a few years ago on the Internet.  It is standard BBS
anarchy G-file
>fare.  The trick is actually finding someone dedicated, or daft, enough
to
>assemble it, safely, without Industrial grade facilities or materials,
in
>their basement, without killing him/herself.

First off, if I'm a terrorist on the scale of Bin Laden or someone, I
can *get* industrial grade facilities and materials.  I have the money,
and a lot of the tools are on the open market.

And second, why are you restricting the max level of expertise available
to the terrorists to "a competent Electrical Engineer?"   I think that a
high-end terrorist group wouldn't have too much trouble finding
themselves, at minimum, a grad student in nuclear engineering...

>Then there is the matter of "whats the fucking point ?"

Terrorists don't always do stuff that makes sense to you or me.  That's
not hype, that's fact.  You've got to be a bit "different" in your
thinking just to get into that line of work at all.

<snip>

>Now nuking large  cities may seem to do this, it does not, however.

Posit -- during the State of the Union address, I detonate two nukes.
The one in DC just got me the President, Vice-President, Speaker of the
House, the entire Supreme Court, both houses of Congress, and every
Cabinet minister but two.  (the "designated successors", who are
deliberately kept out of town on that day.)  And the other nuke was
positioned to clean up the last two that I missed. The government of the
United States has just ceased to exist.

Posit -- I just nuked Norfolk, VA *and* San Diego.  The carrier strength
of the US Navy just got cut at least in half, and let's not even discuss
the other ship losses... and what's worse, *shipyard* losses.  The
effects of that on our ability to project power in the world are?

Posit -- I just nuked Chicago, IL.  The US air transport network just
lost its key hub, O'Hare Airport.  Imagine the effects.

Posit -- I just nuked Kansas City. MO... on April 16th.  The IRS's
central processing center is there.  Every tax return filed for that
year in the country just got blown to vapor.  The US Treasury has just
entered temporary financial paralysis... because not only has over half
of that year's tax revenue gone down the tubes, but the expense required
to reconstruct those records (and they must be reconstructed) will run
into the multi-billions.

Posit -- I just nuked Omaha, NE.  The network communications hub for
half the US government is in there.  Plus the central Federal Reserve
data network transfer node, if I'm not mistaken.

Posit -- Fort Meade and Fort Holabird both turn into plasma.  That's the
NSA central data-processing facility *and* the backup.  The US
intelligence community just lost at least half of its SigInt capacity
and practically *all* of its code-breaking capacity ('cause those two
sites contain most of our cryptographic supercomputers)... and a loss
like that would be catastrophic.

The above is nowhere near a complete list of possible targets...

<snip>

>This is why terrorists are successful, because they are able to scare
USA
>Today reading, mind numbed, sheep and drones into submission.  If you
>really want to defeat terrorism be sharp and have some brains.  Real
>terrorists feed off from fear, so if you like feeding them be my guest.
>All that it takes is the threat of some Russian smuggled Nuke being set
>off in DC to make some spineless idiots quiver.

First off, you are not a "spineless idiot" for being very careful re:
nuclear weapons.  Those things are always an important part of one's
strategic calculation.

Of course, the average terrorist would ignore all of the valid strategic
targets above in favor of blowing up New York or somewhere...

Second, the US is supposed to care about loss of innocent life.  That's
why we're the good guys.  :-)

So when the possibility exists that some psycho will vaporize New York
city, we're supposed to be concerned about it.

--
Chuckg


    Responder ao autor    Encaminhar  
É necessário Acessar antes de postar mensagens.
Para postar uma mensagem você precisa primeiro participar deste grupo.
Atualize seu apelido na página de configurações da inscrição antes de postar.
Você não tem a permissão necessária para postar.
4.  Scott Lurndal  
Ver perfil   Traduzir para Traduzido (ver original)
 Mais opções 1 set 1998, 04:00
Grupos de notícias: alt.security.terrorism, sci.military.naval, rec.aviation.military, alt.books.tom-clancy
De: sl...@rmovengr.sgi.com (Scott Lurndal)
Data: 1998/09/01
Assunto: Re: Why terrorists use nuclear weapons

In article <35ec15f...@news1.starnetinc.com>, "Chuckg" <cglas...@hotmail.com> writes:

|>
|> Posit -- I just nuked Norfolk, VA *and* San Diego.  The carrier strength
|> of the US Navy just got cut at least in half, and let's not even discuss
|> the other ship losses... and what's worse, *shipyard* losses.  The
|> effects of that on our ability to project power in the world are?
|>

Big damn nuke.   Probably not an IND (Sum of all fears notwithstanding).

Make much more sense just to disperse the radioactive elements
effectively preventing use of the area (albeit with MOPP suits,
it could still be used).  In fact, this is a much more likely
scenario than an explosive device - one can obtain industrial
radioactive isotopes such as strontium, cesium, even tritium and
simply use regular explosive devices to distribute the
radioactivity over a large area.

You're also assuming that half the carriers are in port at the time.

|> Posit -- I just nuked Chicago, IL.  The US air transport network just
|> lost its key hub, O'Hare Airport.  Imagine the effects.

Kinda like a pilots strike, eh.

(Hmm..  Technically, could a strike by airline pilots be considered
a terrorist act?)

|>
|> Posit -- I just nuked Kansas City. MO... on April 16th.  The IRS's
|> central processing center is there.  Every tax return filed for that
|> year in the country just got blown to vapor.  The US Treasury has just
|> entered temporary financial paralysis... because not only has over half
|> of that year's tax revenue gone down the tubes, but the expense required
|> to reconstruct those records (and they must be reconstructed) will run
|> into the multi-billions.

Not quite.  There are a number of centers which handle returns (mine
go to Sacto, Ca.).   Note also that the IRS is likely to have
standard d.p. disaster recovery mechanisms in place.

(it would be a good opportunity to dump the 30 year old Univacs, however :-)

|>
|> Posit -- I just nuked Omaha, NE.  The network communications hub for
|> half the US government is in there.  Plus the central Federal Reserve
|> data network transfer node, if I'm not mistaken.
|>

One requirement (or condition?) of the AT&T monopoly in the bad-old-days
of the cold war was to provide nuclear-hardened facilities for the
long-lines division.  As I recall, the locations of these facilities
were not widely known, and the network was such that 'broken' facilities
could be routed around.    This was specifically to provide governmental
communications in the event of an national disaster (such as a nuclear strike).

Ever wonder why most phone company switching centers don't have
windows?

|> Posit -- Fort Meade and Fort Holabird both turn into plasma.  That's the
|> NSA central data-processing facility *and* the backup.  The US
|> intelligence community just lost at least half of its SigInt capacity
|> and practically *all* of its code-breaking capacity ('cause those two
|> sites contain most of our cryptographic supercomputers)... and a loss
|> like that would be catastrophic.

They may have lost people (probably the most irreplacible asset); but
with the exception of custom hardware, most of the NSA assets could be
made available via other government agencies (such as the Blue
Mountain system (48k processor shared memory system) in LANL).

Note also there are downlink sites in Colorado and Sunnyvale.

|>
|> The above is nowhere near a complete list of possible targets...

And to destroy them, would require some very large nuclear devices,
probably multi-stage weapons.

scott


    Responder ao autor    Encaminhar  
É necessário Acessar antes de postar mensagens.
Para postar uma mensagem você precisa primeiro participar deste grupo.
Atualize seu apelido na página de configurações da inscrição antes de postar.
Você não tem a permissão necessária para postar.
5.  Per Andersson  
Ver perfil   Traduzir para Traduzido (ver original)
 Mais opções 1 set 1998, 04:00
Grupos de notícias: soc.culture.israel, alt.security.terrorism, sci.military.naval, rec.aviation.military, alt.books.tom-clancy, alt.fan.tom-clancy
De: pant...@mbox303.swipnet.se (Per Andersson)
Data: 1998/09/01
Assunto: Re: Why terrorists use nuclear weapons

"Dave Powell" <david_powell3...@msn.com> wrote:
>Why nuke an Israeli city where many Muslims are as well? Why not hit some
>whitebread American city with a low Muslim population, to divide the Nation?

Divide the nation? What nation? The US of A?

Pearl Harbor, anyone?

Per Andersson

"Some kind of central planning seems to be  the object of
 most environmental activists. But why is a Politburo expected
 to work better for plants and animals than it did for Russians?"


    Responder ao autor    Encaminhar  
É necessário Acessar antes de postar mensagens.
Para postar uma mensagem você precisa primeiro participar deste grupo.
Atualize seu apelido na página de configurações da inscrição antes de postar.
Você não tem a permissão necessária para postar.
6.  John M. Atkinson  
Ver perfil   Traduzir para Traduzido (ver original)
 Mais opções 1 set 1998, 04:00
Grupos de notícias: soc.culture.israel, alt.security.terrorism, sci.military.naval, rec.aviation.military, alt.books.tom-clancy, alt.fan.tom-clancy
De: jatki...@ix.you.know.what.to.remove.netcom.com (John M. Atkinson)
Data: 1998/09/01
Assunto: Re: Why terrorists use nuclear weapons
On 31 Aug 1998 19:28:54 GMT, south...@oz.fd1.uc.edu (Kamal S.)
drooled:

<Snip a lot of crap that doesn't bear repeating.>

*PLONK*

John M. Atkinson
It may be better to be a live jackal than a dead lion, but it
is better still to be a live lion.  And usually easier.
                                       --L.L.


    Responder ao autor    Encaminhar  
É necessário Acessar antes de postar mensagens.
Para postar uma mensagem você precisa primeiro participar deste grupo.
Atualize seu apelido na página de configurações da inscrição antes de postar.
Você não tem a permissão necessária para postar.

Criar um grupo - Grupos do Google - Página inicial do Google - Termos de Uso - Política de Privacidade
©2009 Google