|
|
Grupos de notícias: sci.military.naval
De: k1...@aol.com (K1374)
Data: 1998/09/01
Assunto: Re: New man on board
Mouth shut, ears open, eyes front. I still think back from time to time about
boot camp at great mistakes....they are good memories. I met alot of really good friends there that, believe it or not, after 17 years I still talk to. GMGC Dennis Dayton, if you're out there, thanks for the direction. Good luck, mate! É necessário Acessar antes de postar mensagens.
Para postar uma mensagem você precisa primeiro participar deste grupo.
Atualize seu apelido na página de configurações da inscrição antes de postar.
Você não tem a permissão necessária para postar.
| ||||||||||||||
Grupos de notícias: sci.military.naval
De: nos...@yadda.yadda.yadda (BlackBeard)
Data: 1998/09/01
Assunto: Re: New man on board
In article <1998090102433400.WAA21...@ladder01.news.aol.com>,
k1...@aol.com (K1374) wrote: I believe that's mouth open, ears shut, eyes front. He did say he was >Mouth shut, ears open, eyes front. I still think back from time to time about going to be an intern at the whitehouse .. right? BlackBeard É necessário Acessar antes de postar mensagens.
Para postar uma mensagem você precisa primeiro participar deste grupo.
Atualize seu apelido na página de configurações da inscrição antes de postar.
Você não tem a permissão necessária para postar.
| ||||||||||||||
Grupos de notícias: sci.military.naval
De: mawar...@t-online.de (Matthias Warkus)
Data: 1998/09/01
Assunto: Submarine communications
I hope I don't look silly as a newbie on this group, but nevertheless
here we go. As far as I can see, submerged submarines normally operate alone since mawa >R+++@ tv(+) b+++(++++)>$ >DI+ D(--)(---) G++ e@(*)>++++ h! !y+ ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ É necessário Acessar antes de postar mensagens.
Para postar uma mensagem você precisa primeiro participar deste grupo.
Atualize seu apelido na página de configurações da inscrição antes de postar.
Você não tem a permissão necessária para postar.
| ||||||||||||||
Grupos de notícias: sci.military.naval
De: Erik van Bronkhorst <zip...@ridgenet.net>
Data: 1998/09/01
Assunto: Re: Submarine communications
Heavens, there are other ways of transmitting information besides
acoustic waves! What about VLF, or blue-green laser... I don't think the subs are intended or needed to function in groups these days so it would probably be of little importance. -- Erik van Bronkhorst kc6...@qsl.net www.qsl.net/kc6uut/ www.ridgenet.net/~caseycct/erik/ "One thing I have learned in a long life: that all our science, É necessário Acessar antes de postar mensagens.
Para postar uma mensagem você precisa primeiro participar deste grupo.
Atualize seu apelido na página de configurações da inscrição antes de postar.
Você não tem a permissão necessária para postar.
| ||||||||||||||
Grupos de notícias: sci.military.naval
De: pant...@mbox303.swipnet.se (Per Andersson)
Data: 1998/09/01
Assunto: Re: Why terrorists use nuclear weapons
Richard Hutchinson <rhu...@home.com> wrote: On the form us foreigners get to sign I really like the "are you a >My favorite question: Do you have any drugs or firearms? I wonder how >many people have ever answered yes. Nazi war-criminal?" question... Though the "are you an international terrorist" bit isn't bad Per Andersson "Some kind of central planning seems to be the object of É necessário Acessar antes de postar mensagens.
Para postar uma mensagem você precisa primeiro participar deste grupo.
Atualize seu apelido na página de configurações da inscrição antes de postar.
Você não tem a permissão necessária para postar.
| ||||||||||||||
Grupos de notícias: sci.military.naval
De: pant...@mbox303.swipnet.se (Per Andersson)
Data: 1998/09/01
Assunto: Re: Why terrorists use nuclear weapons
(snip)
>> Oh. That. Well, when they observe the Geneva Conventions, I'll Look, another savage. >> rescind my statement. >GENEVA IS DEAD. Per Andersson "Some kind of central planning seems to be the object of É necessário Acessar antes de postar mensagens.
Para postar uma mensagem você precisa primeiro participar deste grupo.
Atualize seu apelido na página de configurações da inscrição antes de postar.
Você não tem a permissão necessária para postar.
| ||||||||||||||
Grupos de notícias: soc.culture.israel, alt.security.terrorism, sci.military.naval, rec.aviation.military, alt.books.tom-clancy, alt.fan.tom-clancy
De: "Chuckg" <cglas...@hotmail.com>
Data: 1998/09/01
Assunto: Re: Why terrorists use nuclear weapons
Along the Mexican border, it's an open secret that several thousand
bucks in the palm of the right US Customs man will get your truck waved through the border checkpoint without their even looking at it. Tons of cocaine enter the country through that gaping security flaw every month. (Don't ask me why the government isn't cleaning up that corrupt mess... probably has something to do with the usual government tendency to not want to listen to whistle-blowers.) Any terrorist organization with even a modicum of street smarts could Hell, I don't even need to bribe the Customs guy... I just seal the <snip> >Hmm.. There is still the problem of storage, transporting it(without Plutonium just sitting in a sealed jar in a subcritical mass is only >irradiating the terrorists carrying the stuff), barely radioactive. You can sit next to it for a week without picking up anywhere near a harmful dose. The main danger in handling raw plutonium is that it is one of the most *chemically* toxic substances in the world... but you can beat that with a simple airtight seal. >and then assembling the bomb. Could any competent Electrical Engineer First off, if I'm a terrorist on the scale of Bin Laden or someone, I build >a small Nuke with instructions ? Yes, hell I think that Phrack magazine published >some such plans a few years ago on the Internet. It is standard BBS anarchy G-file >fare. The trick is actually finding someone dedicated, or daft, enough to >assemble it, safely, without Industrial grade facilities or materials, in >their basement, without killing him/herself. can *get* industrial grade facilities and materials. I have the money, and a lot of the tools are on the open market. And second, why are you restricting the max level of expertise available >Then there is the matter of "whats the fucking point ?" Terrorists don't always do stuff that makes sense to you or me. That's not hype, that's fact. You've got to be a bit "different" in your thinking just to get into that line of work at all. <snip> >Now nuking large cities may seem to do this, it does not, however. Posit -- during the State of the Union address, I detonate two nukes. The one in DC just got me the President, Vice-President, Speaker of the House, the entire Supreme Court, both houses of Congress, and every Cabinet minister but two. (the "designated successors", who are deliberately kept out of town on that day.) And the other nuke was positioned to clean up the last two that I missed. The government of the United States has just ceased to exist. Posit -- I just nuked Norfolk, VA *and* San Diego. The carrier strength Posit -- I just nuked Chicago, IL. The US air transport network just Posit -- I just nuked Kansas City. MO... on April 16th. The IRS's Posit -- I just nuked Omaha, NE. The network communications hub for Posit -- Fort Meade and Fort Holabird both turn into plasma. That's the The above is nowhere near a complete list of possible targets... <snip> >This is why terrorists are successful, because they are able to scare First off, you are not a "spineless idiot" for being very careful re: USA >Today reading, mind numbed, sheep and drones into submission. If you >really want to defeat terrorism be sharp and have some brains. Real >terrorists feed off from fear, so if you like feeding them be my guest. >All that it takes is the threat of some Russian smuggled Nuke being set >off in DC to make some spineless idiots quiver. nuclear weapons. Those things are always an important part of one's strategic calculation. Of course, the average terrorist would ignore all of the valid strategic Second, the US is supposed to care about loss of innocent life. That's So when the possibility exists that some psycho will vaporize New York -- É necessário Acessar antes de postar mensagens.
Para postar uma mensagem você precisa primeiro participar deste grupo.
Atualize seu apelido na página de configurações da inscrição antes de postar.
Você não tem a permissão necessária para postar.
| ||||||||||||||
Grupos de notícias: alt.security.terrorism, sci.military.naval, rec.aviation.military, alt.books.tom-clancy
De: sl...@rmovengr.sgi.com (Scott Lurndal)
Data: 1998/09/01
Assunto: Re: Why terrorists use nuclear weapons
|>
|> Posit -- I just nuked Norfolk, VA *and* San Diego. The carrier strength |> of the US Navy just got cut at least in half, and let's not even discuss |> the other ship losses... and what's worse, *shipyard* losses. The |> effects of that on our ability to project power in the world are? |> Big damn nuke. Probably not an IND (Sum of all fears notwithstanding). Make much more sense just to disperse the radioactive elements You're also assuming that half the carriers are in port at the time. |> Posit -- I just nuked Chicago, IL. The US air transport network just Kinda like a pilots strike, eh. (Hmm.. Technically, could a strike by airline pilots be considered |> Not quite. There are a number of centers which handle returns (mine (it would be a good opportunity to dump the 30 year old Univacs, however :-) |> One requirement (or condition?) of the AT&T monopoly in the bad-old-days Ever wonder why most phone company switching centers don't have |> Posit -- Fort Meade and Fort Holabird both turn into plasma. That's the They may have lost people (probably the most irreplacible asset); but Note also there are downlink sites in Colorado and Sunnyvale. |> And to destroy them, would require some very large nuclear devices, scott É necessário Acessar antes de postar mensagens.
Para postar uma mensagem você precisa primeiro participar deste grupo.
Atualize seu apelido na página de configurações da inscrição antes de postar.
Você não tem a permissão necessária para postar.
| ||||||||||||||
Grupos de notícias: soc.culture.israel, alt.security.terrorism, sci.military.naval, rec.aviation.military, alt.books.tom-clancy, alt.fan.tom-clancy
De: pant...@mbox303.swipnet.se (Per Andersson)
Data: 1998/09/01
Assunto: Re: Why terrorists use nuclear weapons
"Dave Powell" <david_powell3...@msn.com> wrote: Divide the nation? What nation? The US of A? >Why nuke an Israeli city where many Muslims are as well? Why not hit some >whitebread American city with a low Muslim population, to divide the Nation? Pearl Harbor, anyone? Per Andersson "Some kind of central planning seems to be the object of É necessário Acessar antes de postar mensagens.
Para postar uma mensagem você precisa primeiro participar deste grupo.
Atualize seu apelido na página de configurações da inscrição antes de postar.
Você não tem a permissão necessária para postar.
| ||||||||||||||
Grupos de notícias: soc.culture.israel, alt.security.terrorism, sci.military.naval, rec.aviation.military, alt.books.tom-clancy, alt.fan.tom-clancy
De: jatki...@ix.you.know.what.to.remove.netcom.com (John M. Atkinson)
Data: 1998/09/01
Assunto: Re: Why terrorists use nuclear weapons
On 31 Aug 1998 19:28:54 GMT, south...@oz.fd1.uc.edu (Kamal S.)
drooled: <Snip a lot of crap that doesn't bear repeating.> *PLONK* John M. Atkinson É necessário Acessar antes de postar mensagens.
Para postar uma mensagem você precisa primeiro participar deste grupo.
Atualize seu apelido na página de configurações da inscrição antes de postar.
Você não tem a permissão necessária para postar.
| ||||||||||||||
| Criar um grupo - Grupos do Google - Página inicial do Google - Termos de Uso - Política de Privacidade |
| ©2009 Google |