sci.military.naval Google Group

Re: Anti-War Up - U.S. Army Underreporting Suicides...by Dahr Jamail

2009-11-21T03:37:24Z

"Dr. Vincent Quin, Ph.D." <d...@coldine.edu> wrote in
Could be worse. Could be the Rusian military. They have rates half
again higher than those for the US and they don't have a war going
on.
IBM

Military Space Plane = Space life boat?

2009-11-21T03:27:08Z

It sounds like the general thrust of the stuff discussed on here a
couple months back, it could be a neat "on call" rescue launcher!

Re: What happened here?

2009-11-21T03:17:49Z

On Fri, 20 Nov 2009 19:46:50 -0700, Fred J. McCall
I like standing by the truth, you could try it.
(Nice snip Fred, you just can't do anything straigh up and
honest, can you?)
Peter Skelton

Re: US Navy of 2009 vs 1990

2009-11-21T03:09:15Z

In article <hd14p1$dr...@news.eternal-sep tember.org>, tan...@peakoil.com
says...
I'm curious how the US Army might help out in such a fight ?

Re: Unconditional Surrender

2009-11-21T03:02:33Z

Jayzuz Murphy. Next, those who suffer from Obama Derangement Syndrome
will defend Obama even if he's caught molesting small children!
What a stupid bint Nilita is!

Re: Unconditional Surrender

2009-11-21T03:00:20Z

Ignorant fuckwit.
<plonk>

Re: OT: JPL

2009-11-21T02:52:01Z

No, you were arguing with me about my characterization of the US
system.
They didn't give you guys regular desks for that sort of thing?
Or did you never hold a UK security clearance, either?

Re: What happened here?

2009-11-21T02:49:59Z

So when are you going to STFU and stop making such stupid remarks?

Re: Bloodiest naval battle of all time

2009-11-21T02:49:31Z

Possible contenders:
Battle of Trafalgar
Divine Wind battle (Mongol fleet hit by storm)
Actium
Some of the Greek vs. Persian stuff must have been pretty nasty,
especially when ships were loaded with troops. Armor is no fun if you
fall overboard.

Re: What happened here?

2009-11-21T02:48:32Z

The Jooooz are Clinton's fault? Wow, he really got around! Hard to
believe he'd settle for Paula after that...

Re: What happened here?

2009-11-21T02:46:50Z

You always do.

Re: Govt reviewing costly post-9/11 air defense system

2009-11-21T02:46:56Z

On Nov 20, 8:42 am, Jack Linthicum <jacklinthi...@earthlink.net>
wrote:
As in a civilian airliner? I would guess so. The problem is that if
they did phase it out and an airliner attack happened again, or
something similar with another type of aircraft, the public would
demand to know why defensive planes weren't at the ready to stop it.

Re: Hey cousin Dave.

2009-11-21T02:31:35Z

In article <71c3a94a-2990-43c3-8ede-1474e 5760435
@c3g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>, dboh...@mindspring.com says...
I think there are several things Kearsage could have done to maintain
firing angles on Alabama:
1. Emergency gear to move the rudder independent of the rudder post.
2. Changing heading by adjusting sails

Re: Hey cousin Dave.

2009-11-21T02:30:43Z

How far forward or aft could Kearsage fire with steering sails?
Nobody like setting fire to their own sails.
Rigging a jury rudder is hard enough with an enemy pouring shot into
your stern where you are trying to rig it.
Having Kearsage underway would cause no problems for Alabama to
maneuver to keep on her stern firing the entire time.

Re: Hey cousin Dave.

2009-11-21T02:28:49Z

On Nov 20, 3:04 pm, Jack Linthicum <jacklinthi...@earthlink.net>
wrote:
With Kearsage's rudder out of operation, , the Alabama could have
simply gone into the arcs where Kearsage could not fire and hammered
Kearsage into submission. Sometimes luck counts
============================== ============================== =========