O grupo no qual você está postando é um grupo da Usenet. As mensagens postadas neste grupo farão com que o seu e-mail fique visível para qualquer pessoa na internet.
Based upon the news reports I have heard in regard to the massacre at Food Hood, I am wondering if this Doctor was programmed. My belief that he was programmed is that, based upon news reports, his Islamic condemnations of the West via writings and websites started within a short interval of the massacre that occurred, 2) his increase in religious study started shortly before the event that occurred, and 3) during the massacre he quoted some passages of the Quran. To me, it reminds too much of the movie “The Manchurian Candidate” where the person changes his persona upon hearing the words “Remember the red queen” or sees the card of the “Red Queen.” Maybe, in the case it was “remember the Sura ….” As a trigger, and that may be why he quoted that Sura in the massacre. With what has happened, there should be an evaluation psychological of various doctors and with a higher priority of those who profess extreme devoutness in faith, no matter faith it is as Christian, Muslin, Hindu, or others. The reason is that based upon past history various atrocities as the Manson case and others, the people doing felt they were responding from a call from a higher deity. As part of my business practice, I tend to keep faith and business separate as work is a captive environment, and this practice was recommended in one issue of the Harvard Business Review (2009). For example, if someone when working with them on business tells me they know the date the world will end, I excuse myself from the room and conversation. I and my sister went through too much of the use of faith to control and brainwash people in the 70;s. Let me know what you think,
> Based upon the news reports I have heard in regard to the massacre at > Food Hood, I am wondering if this Doctor was programmed. My belief > that he was programmed is that, based upon news reports, his Islamic > condemnations of the West via writings and websites started within a > short interval of the massacre that occurred, 2) his increase in > religious study started shortly before the event that occurred, and 3) > during the massacre he quoted some passages of the Quran. To me, it > reminds too much of the movie “The Manchurian Candidate” where the > person changes his persona upon hearing the words “Remember the red > queen” or sees the card of the “Red Queen.” Maybe, in the case it was > “remember the Sura ….” As a trigger, and that may be why he quoted > that Sura in the massacre. > With what has happened, there should be an evaluation psychological > of various doctors and with a higher priority of those who profess > extreme devoutness in faith, no matter faith it is as Christian, > Muslin, Hindu, or others. The reason is that based upon past history > various atrocities as the Manson case and others, the people doing > felt they were responding from a call from a higher deity. As part of > my business practice, I tend to keep faith and business separate as > work is a captive environment, and this practice was recommended in > one issue of the Harvard Business Review (2009). For example, if > someone when working with them on business tells me they know the date > the world will end, I excuse myself from the room and conversation. I > and my sister went through too much of the use of faith to control and > brainwash people in the 70;s. > Let me know what you think,
> Ebe
Hi,
Based upon the events that happened at Fort Hood regarding a Doctor with suspected devout beliefs, the paper by Friedman (1999) discusses a similar religious situation at work. In the situation discussed by Friedman (1999) a religious work social groups puts out a memo in regard to the Bible and it makes certain employees who GLBT, gay / lesbian/ bi/ transsexual, uncomfortable about working and the people who put the memo out. The question asked is what should the company do? The response I agree with is that the company should send a memo stating the companies core values and that any attitude that breeds intolerance of others is not tolerated, even on religious grounds. In my company, all that work with me and know me realize not to mix religious with business discussion with me. In fact, if someone uses a religious metaphor with me in a business discussion, the discussion is halted and rescheduled for another time. Based upon what happened at Fort Hood with the Doctor who is accused of shooting and hurting those people, the event demonstrates an organizational change that needs to occur. First, religious discussion is to be separated from work. Two, any religious discuss that breeds intolerance should be investigated and the person investigated with a psychological test in sudden changes. Third, based upon what has happened a policy regarding the core values of the organization should be stated and the people of the organization should work as professionals, and not let their religious views or perception of others infringe upon others. It is too bad, so many people had to die and be hurt for something to be done. In closing, this is the reason why I do not support fundamentalism of the Christian or other faiths because it leads to violent results. I am very spiritual, but do not attend local churches since the change to conservative fundamentalism starting in 2000. As scholars, we should realize and implement practices that make the workplace safer and is tolerant of all peoples.
Let me know what you think.
Reference
.Friedman, R. (1999). , The Case of the Religious Network Group. Harvard Business Review, Jul/Aug99, 77(4), p28-36.
> I don't think Ray knows what Stockholm Syndrome is.
It's a horrible disease caused by oral sex with Swedish blondes. You die in exquisite agony covered in bursting pustules, begging for relief. The pustules, that is. You just have to take your chances.
-- "The past resembles the future as water resembles water" -- Ibn Khaldun
If you wish to email me, try putting a dot between alan and lothian. Blueyonder is a thing of the past.
Alan Lothian wrote: > In article <HiKJm.52034$PH1.21177@edtnps82>, La N > <nilita2004NOS...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> I don't think Ray knows what Stockholm Syndrome is.
> It's a horrible disease caused by oral sex with Swedish blondes. You > die in exquisite agony covered in bursting pustules, begging for > relief. The pustules, that is. You just have to take your chances.
No. That's a fantasy. ;>
- nilita, "half Swedish, half human", according to her late father ...
<nilita2004NOS...@yahoo.com> wrote: > Alan Lothian wrote: > > In article <HiKJm.52034$PH1.21177@edtnps82>, La N > > <nilita2004NOS...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> I don't think Ray knows what Stockholm Syndrome is.
> > It's a horrible disease caused by oral sex with Swedish blondes. You > > die in exquisite agony covered in bursting pustules, begging for > > relief. The pustules, that is. You just have to take your chances.
> No. That's a fantasy. ;>
> - nilita, "half Swedish, half human", according to her late father ...
I don't know about this human stuff. Greatly over-rated species. All I can say is that I am glad my French health insurance is more or less in order. Bursting pustules no fun at all. Few Swedes in the Ardeche at this time of year, half-human or otherwise, but baaad, baaad women a-plenty. For some reason, none of them will even look at me. Can't think why. I shower every three weeks whether I need it or not, and clean my teeth every Sunday. Well, most Sundays. And I own not one, but *two* sets of underpants. The reason I am barred from the local laundromat is, as my court case will demonstrate, a gross abuse of my human rights.
Have to say that Faat Slaags are remarkably rare in this part of Frogistan. Not that it makes any difference to me. Plus de chiens, plus de chats (no smartass stuff about chatte, if you please) et plus de femmes. Les plantes..... on peut parler aux plantes. People have started correcting my French again, so I must be getting somewhere.
-- "The past resembles the future as water resembles water" -- Ibn Khaldun
If you wish to email me, try putting a dot between alan and lothian. Blueyonder is a thing of the past.
<nilita2004NOS...@yahoo.com> wrote: > Alan Lothian wrote: > > In article <lIWJm.52098$PH1.47591@edtnps82>, La N > > <nilita2004NOS...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> - nilita, "half Swedish, half human", according to her late father > >> ...
> > I don't know about this human stuff. Greatly over-rated species.
> Do you know what the "human" half is, according to my dad?
Bottom, top, left, right. Hmmm. Frankly, I shudder to think. In my admittedly limited experience, women with bottom halves in the human business tend to have top halves doing much the same thing. Of course, anecdotal evidence is not science, and I look forward to reading a properly peer-reviewed paper that will be the work of a younger and more dedicated researcher than I could ever hope to be.
> *nglish. (that's was what he was)
Not my fault, wouldn't wish it on my worst enemy.
> - nilita
-- "The past resembles the future as water resembles water" -- Ibn Khaldun
If you wish to email me, try putting a dot between alan and lothian. Blueyonder is a thing of the past.
|
