Boxing=Barbarism
sinalizar
Mensagens 1 - 10 de 649 - Recolher todas
/groups/adfetch?adid=WwSChxIAAACFhv86I8sIPN01d9PqCit1xyxpo7bMRVgpn9ZMKisPfQ
Boxing=Barbarism  
O grupo no qual você está postando é um grupo da Usenet. As mensagens postadas neste grupo farão com que o seu e-mail fique visível para qualquer pessoa na internet.
Sua resposta não foi enviada.
Postagem publicada
 
De:
Para:
Cc:
Encaminhar para
Adicionar Cc | Adicionar Encaminhar para | Editar Assunto
Assunto:
Validação:
Com o objetivo de verificação, digite os caracteres que você vê na figura abaixo ou os números que ouvir ao clicar no ícone de acessibilidade. Ouça e digite os números que ouvir
 
1.  Scott Anthony Rick  
Ver perfil   Traduzir para Traduzido (ver original)
 Mais opções 30 abr 1994, 16:33
Grupos de notícias: rec.sport.boxing
De: sco...@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Scott Anthony Rick)
Data: 30 Apr 1994 03:51:33 GMT
Local: Sab 30 abr 1994 00:51
Assunto: Boxing=Barbarism
Boxing is a sick, barbaric sport.  I mean the ultimate goal is to render
your opponent unconscious.  How pathetic!  What we need is more men making
love to each other, not beating the shit out of each other.

Public flames welcome.


    Responder ao autor    Encaminhar  
É necessário Acessar antes de postar mensagens.
Para postar uma mensagem você precisa primeiro participar deste grupo.
Atualize seu apelido na página de configurações da inscrição antes de postar.
Você não tem a permissão necessária para postar.
2.  Mike Benedetti  
Ver perfil   Traduzir para Traduzido (ver original)
 Mais opções 30 abr 1994, 17:19
Grupos de notícias: rec.sport.boxing
De: bened...@bradbert.ugcs.caltech.edu (Mike Benedetti)
Data: 30 Apr 1994 04:34:20 GMT
Local: Sab 30 abr 1994 01:34
Assunto: Re: Boxing=Barbarism
sco...@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Scott Anthony Rick) writes:

>Boxing is a sick, barbaric sport.  I mean the ultimate goal is to render
>your opponent unconscious.  How pathetic!  What we need is more men making
>love to each other, not beating the shit out of each other.

I find boxing to be a very graceful sport--it's the only major sport I
follow. I don't watch boxing to watch people get hurt (although they do),
I watch boxing to watch two men in excellent physical condition challenge
each other in a very direct and physical manner; unlike racket sports,
or even something like football, virtually nothing separates the
competitors.

There are plenty of places in our society where people are hurt, and
often at a more fundamental level. Our whole society is barbaric--learn
to deal with it, Scotty.


    Responder ao autor    Encaminhar  
É necessário Acessar antes de postar mensagens.
Para postar uma mensagem você precisa primeiro participar deste grupo.
Atualize seu apelido na página de configurações da inscrição antes de postar.
Você não tem a permissão necessária para postar.
3.  The Ring Rat  
Ver perfil   Traduzir para Traduzido (ver original)
 Mais opções 30 abr 1994, 17:25
Grupos de notícias: rec.sport.boxing
De: r...@cs.iastate.edu (The Ring Rat)
Data: 30 Apr 94 04:35:07 GMT
Local: Sab 30 abr 1994 01:35
Assunto: Re: Boxing=Barbarism
sco...@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Scott Anthony Rick) writes:

>Boxing is a sick, barbaric sport.  I mean the ultimate goal is to render
>your opponent unconscious.  How pathetic!  What we need is more men making
>love to each other, not beating the shit out of each other.

        Fag.

--
begin 600 mY_vErY_OwN_SiGnaTuRe_FiLe
G5&AI<R!I<R!J=7-T(&UY("YS:6<@9FEL92X@($YE870L(&AU:#\*
`
end


    Responder ao autor    Encaminhar  
É necessário Acessar antes de postar mensagens.
Para postar uma mensagem você precisa primeiro participar deste grupo.
Atualize seu apelido na página de configurações da inscrição antes de postar.
Você não tem a permissão necessária para postar.
4.  Theo Seiz  
Ver perfil   Traduzir para Traduzido (ver original)
 Mais opções 2 maio 1994, 09:28
Grupos de notícias: rec.sport.boxing
De: h9050...@d13.wu-wien.ac.at (Theo Seiz)
Data: 2 May 1994 12:03:18 GMT
Local: Seg 2 maio 1994 09:03
Assunto: Re: Boxing=Barbarism
In article <2pskk5INN...@uwm.edu>, sco...@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Scott Anthony Rick) writes:
|> Boxing is a sick, barbaric sport.  I mean the ultimate goal is to render
|> your opponent unconscious.  How pathetic!  What we need is more men making
|> love to each other, not beating the shit out of each other.

Obviosly Scott Anthony Rick likes making love to men ... ;-)

|>
|> Public flames welcome.

You're not important enough.


    Responder ao autor    Encaminhar  
É necessário Acessar antes de postar mensagens.
Para postar uma mensagem você precisa primeiro participar deste grupo.
Atualize seu apelido na página de configurações da inscrição antes de postar.
Você não tem a permissão necessária para postar.
5.  John R. Cobarruvias  
Ver perfil   Traduzir para Traduzido (ver original)
 Mais opções 3 maio 1994, 10:15
Grupos de notícias: rec.sport.boxing
Encaminhar para: rec.sport.boxing
De: cobarruv...@asd1.jsc.nasa.gov (John R. Cobarruvias)
Data: Tue, 3 May 1994 12:59:20 GMT
Local: Ter 3 maio 1994 09:59
Assunto: Re: Boxing=Barbarism

In article <5kzNsSh.s...@delphi.com>, Ted <s...@delphi.com> wrote:
> It's no surprise that very early in the life of this discussion group the
> subject of homosexuality would emerge.

I disagree. It a VERY BIG SURPRISE that homosexuality emerged. It's a
suprise that sexuality emerged. This is rec.sport.boxing not rec.sport.sex.
Do a Request for Discussion if it doesnt exist.

>Joyce Carol Oates, in her excellent
> book "On Boxing", referred to the homoerotic aspect of this sport. I don't
> think one has to be gay, or a woman, to see this. And IMHO, part of the
> interest in boxing for a lot of men, both participants and spectators, is
> a sublimated form of homoeroticism.

I find myself wanting to explore my feminine side when watching a fighter
beat the living crap outa someone. [insert Beevis and Butthead laugh here]

> Also, not all gay men find boxing to be sick or barbaric. Some of us even
> box, myself included.

Well good for you! [geez who pulled your chain?]

    Responder ao autor    Encaminhar  
É necessário Acessar antes de postar mensagens.
Para postar uma mensagem você precisa primeiro participar deste grupo.
Atualize seu apelido na página de configurações da inscrição antes de postar.
Você não tem a permissão necessária para postar.
6.  Conrad Claus  
Ver perfil   Traduzir para Traduzido (ver original)
 Mais opções 5 maio 1994, 18:23
Grupos de notícias: rec.sport.boxing
De: ccl...@willamette.edu (Conrad Claus)
Data: Thu, 5 May 1994 17:44:17 GMT
Local: Qui 5 maio 1994 14:44
Assunto: Re: Boxing=Barbarism
John R. Cobarruvias (cobarruv...@asd1.jsc.nasa.gov) wrote:
: In article <5kzNsSh.s...@delphi.com>, Ted <s...@delphi.com> wrote:

: > It's no surprise that very early in the life of this discussion group the
: > subject of homosexuality would emerge.

: I disagree. It a VERY BIG SURPRISE that homosexuality emerged. It's a
: suprise that sexuality emerged. This is rec.sport.boxing not rec.sport.sex.
: Do a Request for Discussion if it doesnt exist.

: >Joyce Carol Oates, in her excellent
: > book "On Boxing", referred to the homoerotic aspect of this sport. I don't
: > think one has to be gay, or a woman, to see this. And IMHO, part of the
: > interest in boxing for a lot of men, both participants and spectators, is
: > a sublimated form of homoeroticism.

Her *excellent* book?  That was one of the more goofy books I have read
in quite some time.  Besides the fact that she more stressed the
elemental beauty/savagery or boxing rather than any homoerotic aspects of
the sport.  Frankly, I find it a VERY BIG SURPRISE
(to quote my very correct fellow newsgroup dweller above) that
Joyce Carol Oates is brought up in a discussion about boxing.  Her
pontifications about boxing were somewhat obscure, and fairly reeked of
someone stretching to sound deep.  I found a couple of her observations
curious and interesting, (especially since it gave me some perspective of
how folks who like boxing but have never done it could view the sport) -
However, if she had stopped trying to make her book some sort of
literary analog to a piece of modern art that could
be read aloud at some "socially cutting edge" party, perhaps her
observations would have been of more value.  

: I find myself wanting to explore my feminine side when watching a fighter
: beat the living crap outa someone. [insert Beevis and Butthead laugh here]

Actually I NEVER find myself wanting to explore my feminine side :->

: >  
: > Also, not all gay men find boxing to be sick or barbaric. Some of us even
: > box, myself included.

: Well good for you! [geez who pulled your chain?]

Geeze!! I wish this up to now short (but oh too long) "make sex not
boxing" (now being modified to a "make sex AND boxing") thread would
end.  I would suggest this be posted to any one of the several pro and
con homosexuality groups.  I would crosspost this, but I am afraid it
would just invite more participants to enter into a discussion regarding
this HERE.

Conrad
--


    Responder ao autor    Encaminhar  
É necessário Acessar antes de postar mensagens.
Para postar uma mensagem você precisa primeiro participar deste grupo.
Atualize seu apelido na página de configurações da inscrição antes de postar.
Você não tem a permissão necessária para postar.
7.  John R. Cobarruvias  
Ver perfil   Traduzir para Traduzido (ver original)
 Mais opções 3 maio 1994, 17:01
Grupos de notícias: rec.sport.boxing
Encaminhar para: rec.sport.boxing
De: cobarruv...@asd1.jsc.nasa.gov (John R. Cobarruvias)
Data: Mon, 2 May 1994 18:08:32 GMT
Local: Seg 2 maio 1994 15:08
Assunto: Re: Boxing=Barbarism
In article <2q2q66$...@osiris.wu-wien.ac.at>, h9050...@d13.wu-wien.ac.at

(Theo Seiz) wrote:
> In article <2pskk5INN...@uwm.edu>, sco...@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Scott Anthony Rick) writes:
> |> Boxing is a sick, barbaric sport.  I mean the ultimate goal is to render
> |> your opponent unconscious.  How pathetic!  What we need is more men making
> |> love to each other, not beating the shit out of each other.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
             zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
                                ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
                                                    zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz


    Responder ao autor    Encaminhar  
É necessário Acessar antes de postar mensagens.
Para postar uma mensagem você precisa primeiro participar deste grupo.
Atualize seu apelido na página de configurações da inscrição antes de postar.
Você não tem a permissão necessária para postar.
8.  Ted  
Ver perfil   Traduzir para Traduzido (ver original)
 Mais opções 3 maio 1994, 22:40
Grupos de notícias: rec.sport.boxing
De: Ted <s...@delphi.com>
Data: Tue, 3 May 94 00:15:29 -0500
Local: Ter 3 maio 1994 02:15
Assunto: Re: Boxing=Barbarism
It's no surprise that very early in the life of this discussion group the
subject of homosexuality would emerge. Joyce Carol Oates, in her excellent
book "On Boxing", referred to the homoerotic aspect of this sport. I don't
think one has to be gay, or a woman, to see this. And IMHO, part of the
interest in boxing for a lot of men, both participants and spectators, is
a sublimated form of homoeroticism.

Also, not all gay men find boxing to be sick or barbaric. Some of us even
box, myself included.


    Responder ao autor    Encaminhar  
É necessário Acessar antes de postar mensagens.
Para postar uma mensagem você precisa primeiro participar deste grupo.
Atualize seu apelido na página de configurações da inscrição antes de postar.
Você não tem a permissão necessária para postar.
9.  ifcq513  
Ver perfil   Traduzir para Traduzido (ver original)
 Mais opções 4 maio 1994, 04:40
Grupos de notícias: rec.sport.boxing
De: ifcq...@utxvms.cc.utexas.edu
Data: 3 May 94 18:43:32 CST
Local: Ter 3 maio 1994 21:43
Assunto: Re: Boxing=Barbarism

In article <5kzNsSh.s...@delphi.com>, Ted <s...@delphi.com> writes:
> It's no surprise that very early in the life of this discussion group the
> subject of homosexuality would emerge. Joyce Carol Oates, in her excellent
> book "On Boxing", referred to the homoerotic aspect of this sport. I don't
> think one has to be gay, or a woman, to see this.

Ah poppycock.  The reason homosexuality has come up is because a gay man (or
one who implied he was) came out and threw up some silly flame bait.  And some
people went for it.  Frankly I don't see what is homoerotic about men fighting
each other, in fact it seems the anti-thesis of this.  If they were shooting
each other would that be homoerotic too?  What if two women were fighting?

Of course if it gives YOU those kind of jollies, hey to each his own.


    Responder ao autor    Encaminhar  
É necessário Acessar antes de postar mensagens.
Para postar uma mensagem você precisa primeiro participar deste grupo.
Atualize seu apelido na página de configurações da inscrição antes de postar.
Você não tem a permissão necessária para postar.
Moorer didn't beat the "Real Deal"  
1.  Richard CDeBaca  
Ver perfil   Traduzir para Traduzido (ver original)
 Mais opções 30 abr 1994, 16:56
Grupos de notícias: rec.sport.boxing
De: rcdeb...@nmsu.edu (Richard CDeBaca)
Data: 28 Apr 1994 20:30:58 GMT
Local: Qui 28 abr 1994 17:30
Assunto: Moorer didn't beat the "Real Deal"
        I had only read about the Holyfield Moorer fight up until
        the HBO replay which I watched. The AP newspaper story on the
        saturday after the fight mentioned the 2nd round knock down
        and described Moorer getting up and dominating the fight
        from there on with right jabs left hooks, etc.  I was led to
        believe Moorer outboxed the pants of "The Real Deal".

        It wasn't until I watched the HBO replay that I realized
        what happened.  This was not Holyfield vs Moore but rather
        Moore vs a weary maybe even sick Evander Holyfield.
        Anyone who has followed Holyfield's career could tell
        something was definitely wrong with Evander friday night.
        Holyfield would have lost to almost anybody that night.
        Someone just needed to show up and throw punches. I'm not
        making excuses for Holyfield but let's not give credit to
        Moorer when credit isn't due.

        I think Holyfield would have lost any of his former title
        defenses if he would have been in the condition he was in friday.
        (maybe with the exception of Larry Holmes.)
        Foreman would have had many opportunities for a knock out through
        out the night. Bert Cooper would have had enough killer instinct
        to finish Holyfield off, after seeing him in the condition he was in.
        Bowe certainly would have KO'd Holyfield.  Michael Moorer just
        happened to be the one scheduled to fight Holyfield this time.
        And I don't disagree with the HBO announcers when they said things
        like "where is the desire" about Moore.  Holyfield was in a
        deteriorated state either from health reasons or Moorers punches
        or both, and Moorer should have been going for the knock out.
        Comparisons between Moorer and Tyson are ridiculous. Tyson would
        have had the killer instinct to finish off a fighter in Holyfield's
        state in the 5th or 6th round.

        Even Teddy Atlas realized this wasn't the same Holyfield when
        he said things like "there is something wrong with this guy",
        "He's finished" and something like if you don't beat him the
        next guy will. It wasn't that Moorer punched Holyfield into this
        groggy wobbly state, I think Atlas definitely realized this
        wasn't the usual Evander Holyfield and taking the title would
        be like taking candy from a baby.

        This Holyfield was a lethargic, wobbly and weak boxer, who
        seemed to be deteriorating as the fight went on whether or
        not he was getting hit. Holyfield looked as tired in the 3rd
        round as he usually looks in the 9th or 10th round.
        Holyfield's trademarks were always his super energy and high
        percentage of punches thrown per round.  Holyfield was never
        a super powerful puncher who would devastate his opponents.
        Instead Holyfield would get into the ring with equally talented
        boxers like Moorer and beat them with an energetic 8 or more
        rounds of boxing, where he would always be sure to throw a higher
        percentage of punches than his opponent and would increase the
        pace of the fight just past what his opponents could handle.
        Holyfield would throw 7 or 8-punch combinations where he was
        putting so much effort into his punches his feet would come
        off the canvas. This Holyfield would have beaten Moorer. Friday
        night he was mustering up all he had just to throw 3 or 4-punch
        combinations every once in a while. Holyfield was getting to
        Moorer with the straight right whenever he threw it, but he just
        didn't have the energy to throw it enough. A younger Holyfield
        would have.

        Watching friday night's fight was almost as heartbreaking as
        watching Muhammed Ali vs. Larry Holmes. Larry Holmes did not beat
        "The Greatest" that night. And Moorer did not beat the "Real Deal"
        friday night.  He beat a vestige of Holyfield's former self.

        Even so, Holyfield fought a rugged 12 round fight and did all he
        could do. Holyfield brought only one thing into this fight -
        courage, and a boxer needs more than that to succeed.

        So then, he must retire.

        Goodbye Champ ...


    Responder ao autor    Encaminhar  
É necessário Acessar antes de postar mensagens.
Para postar uma mensagem você precisa primeiro participar deste grupo.
Atualize seu apelido na página de configurações da inscrição antes de postar.
Você não tem a permissão necessária para postar.

Criar um grupo - Grupos do Google - Página inicial do Google - Termos de Uso - Política de Privacidade
©2009 Google