<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <id>http://groups.google.com.br/group/alt.comp.linux</id>
  <title type="text">alt.comp.linux Google Group</title>
  <subtitle type="text">
  </subtitle>
  <link href="/group/alt.comp.linux/feed/atom_v1_0_msgs.xml" rel="self" title="alt.comp.linux feed"/>
  <updated>2009-11-21T15:28:07Z</updated>
  <generator uri="http://groups.google.com.br" version="1.99">Google Groups</generator>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>David Brown</name>
  <email>david.br...@hesbynett.removethisbit.no</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-21T15:28:07Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.br/group/alt.comp.linux/browse_thread/thread/7d0660e2abd4388b/924b20a843e9ece9?show_docid=924b20a843e9ece9</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.br/group/alt.comp.linux/browse_thread/thread/7d0660e2abd4388b/924b20a843e9ece9?show_docid=924b20a843e9ece9"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Which volume/filesystem for a 15.0TB RAID hard drive?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  That&#39;s an interesting link - I had no idea the performance impact was so &lt;br&gt; high. All checking systems are going to have some sort of performance &lt;br&gt; issues, so they will be difficult if you need to have high performance &lt;br&gt; all the time. Often you have low use periods (such as the middle of the &lt;br&gt; night) when you can do such maintenance tasks. If not, then it sounds
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Man-wai Chang to The Door (28800bps)</name>
  <email>toylet.toy...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-20T11:21:53Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.br/group/alt.comp.linux/browse_thread/thread/85e31298e4b09ad6/e89e702d9d201a9c?show_docid=e89e702d9d201a9c</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.br/group/alt.comp.linux/browse_thread/thread/85e31298e4b09ad6/e89e702d9d201a9c?show_docid=e89e702d9d201a9c"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Anyone Tried Win4Lin?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Use Wine or CrossOver Office....
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>jarek</name>
  <email>ja...@nospam.pl</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-20T10:14:41Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.br/group/alt.comp.linux/browse_thread/thread/7d0660e2abd4388b/80c6931fd1140b7e?show_docid=80c6931fd1140b7e</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.br/group/alt.comp.linux/browse_thread/thread/7d0660e2abd4388b/80c6931fd1140b7e?show_docid=80c6931fd1140b7e"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Which volume/filesystem for a 15.0TB RAID hard drive?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  David Brown pisze: &lt;br&gt; Snapshots on LVM takes a lot of performance. For heavy loaded servers &lt;br&gt; they are rather useless. Take a look here: &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.nikhef.nl/~dennisvd/lvmcrap.html&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; Backups of Terabyte-volumes are real hell. DLT-S4 drive can achive &lt;br&gt; 200GB/h. It means that 15TB backup will take 75 hours with fully loaded
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Richard Turner</name>
  <email>rtur...@fduck.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-19T13:22:00Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.br/group/alt.comp.linux/browse_thread/thread/85e31298e4b09ad6/8c0395dead73c06d?show_docid=8c0395dead73c06d</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.br/group/alt.comp.linux/browse_thread/thread/85e31298e4b09ad6/8c0395dead73c06d?show_docid=8c0395dead73c06d"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Anyone Tried Win4Lin?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Yeah, I&#39;ve gotta have Access too. From the site it says you have to have &lt;br&gt; a valid Windows license. If you have a valid Windows license, why not &lt;br&gt; run virtualbox or vmware? I&#39;m running Access over a Win7 RC through &lt;br&gt; virtualbox. EZ setup.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>MCR</name>
  <email>m...@mcronline.doesnotexist.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-19T12:52:28Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.br/group/alt.comp.linux/browse_thread/thread/85e31298e4b09ad6/7547d9f5dd12edde?show_docid=7547d9f5dd12edde</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.br/group/alt.comp.linux/browse_thread/thread/85e31298e4b09ad6/7547d9f5dd12edde?show_docid=7547d9f5dd12edde"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Anyone Tried Win4Lin?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  If you *must* use Windows, a better option is to install it in a VM and &lt;br&gt; run Access from inside that. As it is a full install of Redmonds best, &lt;br&gt; you shouldn&#39;t have any issues. &lt;br&gt; As a developer I would not consider running a Windows program in Wine &lt;br&gt; (Windows is already flaky enough).
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Rick Brandt</name>
  <email>rickbran...@hotmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-19T12:41:04Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.br/group/alt.comp.linux/browse_thread/thread/85e31298e4b09ad6/753e882270cd82ac?show_docid=753e882270cd82ac</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.br/group/alt.comp.linux/browse_thread/thread/85e31298e4b09ad6/753e882270cd82ac?show_docid=753e882270cd82ac"/>
  <title type="text">Anyone Tried Win4Lin?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Just wondering if anyone has any experience with this product and how it &lt;br&gt; compares to using wine. &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://win4lin.com/wp&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; After a change at work that now allows me to remote in from Linux I only &lt;br&gt; have one program that forces me to use Windows and that is Microsoft Access. &lt;br&gt; I tried that with wine about a year ago. While it installed okay I couldn&#39;t
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>RodMcKay</name>
  <email>nojunkm...@no.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-19T10:47:14Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.br/group/alt.comp.linux/browse_thread/thread/b9e50a78cf701d3e/af68d7185619dce3?show_docid=af68d7185619dce3</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.br/group/alt.comp.linux/browse_thread/thread/b9e50a78cf701d3e/af68d7185619dce3?show_docid=af68d7185619dce3"/>
  <title type="text">Re: FAT32 vs NTFS, can Linux be used under NTFS?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 17:52:33 GMT, Snowbat &amp;lt;snow...@geocities.com&amp;gt; &lt;br&gt; wrote: &lt;br&gt; There, isn&#39;t that great? The best of both worlds for everyone, those &lt;br&gt; who want it can have it, those who don&#39;t, don&#39;t have to use it! &lt;br&gt; That&#39;s the way it should be and that&#39;s what customizing should mean, &lt;br&gt; the broadest available means of satisfying everyone!
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Snowbat</name>
  <email>snow...@geocities.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-18T17:52:33Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.br/group/alt.comp.linux/browse_thread/thread/b9e50a78cf701d3e/a08b0a1405ab2256?show_docid=a08b0a1405ab2256</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.br/group/alt.comp.linux/browse_thread/thread/b9e50a78cf701d3e/a08b0a1405ab2256?show_docid=a08b0a1405ab2256"/>
  <title type="text">Re: FAT32 vs NTFS, can Linux be used under NTFS?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  [alt.linux.redhat removed due my provider limiting crossposts to 4 groups] &lt;br&gt; Single window mode will be an option in GIMP 2.8 &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.gimpusers.com/news/2009-09-19/single-window-mode-gimp-2-8-confirmed.html&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Baron</name>
  <email>baron.nos...@linuxmaniac.nospam.net</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-17T22:04:59Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.br/group/alt.comp.linux/browse_thread/thread/b9e50a78cf701d3e/3bef9d3b6918c8f7?show_docid=3bef9d3b6918c8f7</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.br/group/alt.comp.linux/browse_thread/thread/b9e50a78cf701d3e/3bef9d3b6918c8f7?show_docid=3bef9d3b6918c8f7"/>
  <title type="text">Re: FAT32 vs NTFS, can Linux be used under NTFS?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Yes ! I read that one and came to the same conclusion.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>RodMcKay</name>
  <email>nojunkm...@no.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-17T04:16:56Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.br/group/alt.comp.linux/browse_thread/thread/b9e50a78cf701d3e/1d3dee0b4cba0978?show_docid=1d3dee0b4cba0978</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.br/group/alt.comp.linux/browse_thread/thread/b9e50a78cf701d3e/1d3dee0b4cba0978?show_docid=1d3dee0b4cba0978"/>
  <title type="text">Re: FAT32 vs NTFS, can Linux be used under NTFS?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  On Sun, 15 Nov 2009 21:42:03 +0100, Aragorn &lt;br&gt; Actually, that&#39;s good to know. I haven&#39;t actually participated in any &lt;br&gt; Linux ngs before now or really had exposure to anything on other &lt;br&gt; non-Linux ngs. Forewarned is forearmed, though, as the saying goes. &lt;br&gt; &amp;lt;g&amp;gt; I think so, too, despite the challenges I&#39;ve been facing. I&#39;ll
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Van Chocstraw</name>
  <email>boobooililili...@roadrunner.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-16T23:06:47Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.br/group/alt.comp.linux/browse_thread/thread/f5cdb09574ba39a3/fc7747fe6e773ed1?show_docid=fc7747fe6e773ed1</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.br/group/alt.comp.linux/browse_thread/thread/f5cdb09574ba39a3/fc7747fe6e773ed1?show_docid=fc7747fe6e773ed1"/>
  <title type="text">Puppy linux 431</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  This is really great. It install easy and is a nice little OS.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Harold Stevens</name>
  <email>woo...@aces.localdomain</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-15T21:41:00Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.br/group/alt.comp.linux/browse_thread/thread/b9e50a78cf701d3e/6ff244847725a7c7?show_docid=6ff244847725a7c7</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.br/group/alt.comp.linux/browse_thread/thread/b9e50a78cf701d3e/6ff244847725a7c7?show_docid=6ff244847725a7c7"/>
  <title type="text">Re: FAT32 vs NTFS, can Linux be used under NTFS?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  In &amp;lt;hdpp2t$i7...@news.eternal-sep tember.org&amp;gt; Aragorn: &lt;br&gt; [Snip...] &lt;br&gt; I think I spotted one of these snakes in the current (December 2009) Linux &lt;br&gt; Journal &amp;quot;Letters&amp;quot; section. A certain &amp;quot;Richard&amp;quot; whines about troubles using &lt;br&gt; Linux on a laptop. The signature phrase concerning Linux usability: &lt;br&gt; it is light-years away, strictly for computer specialists
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Aragorn</name>
  <email>arag...@chatfactory.invalid</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-15T20:42:03Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.br/group/alt.comp.linux/browse_thread/thread/b9e50a78cf701d3e/557aafe1f8fc8158?show_docid=557aafe1f8fc8158</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.br/group/alt.comp.linux/browse_thread/thread/b9e50a78cf701d3e/557aafe1f8fc8158?show_docid=557aafe1f8fc8158"/>
  <title type="text">Re: FAT32 vs NTFS, can Linux be used under NTFS?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  On Sunday 15 November 2009 19:11 in alt.os.linux, somebody identifying &lt;br&gt; as RodMcKay wrote... &lt;br&gt; Also please bear in mind that a lof of what you hear about GNU/Linux is &lt;br&gt; deliberate FUD (&amp;quot;Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt&amp;quot;) spread either by MICROS~1 &lt;br&gt; directly through their websites or anything from slight innuendo to
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>J.O. Aho</name>
  <email>u...@example.net</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-15T18:29:25Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.br/group/alt.comp.linux/browse_thread/thread/b9e50a78cf701d3e/45dd0176d361e91c?show_docid=45dd0176d361e91c</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.br/group/alt.comp.linux/browse_thread/thread/b9e50a78cf701d3e/45dd0176d361e91c?show_docid=45dd0176d361e91c"/>
  <title type="text">Re: FAT32 vs NTFS, can Linux be used under NTFS?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Just run GIMP on it&#39;s own virtual desktop and the other application on another &lt;br&gt; virtual desktop. Myself I run different application on different virtual &lt;br&gt; desktops, that way they don&#39;t mess up with each other. &lt;br&gt; You can build your own scripts to do things for you, never done that myself as &lt;br&gt; I don&#39;t do much with GIMP more than resize and sometimes add some small things.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>RodMcKay</name>
  <email>nojunkm...@no.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-15T18:26:01Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.br/group/alt.comp.linux/browse_thread/thread/b9e50a78cf701d3e/b05de42861af783a?show_docid=b05de42861af783a</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.br/group/alt.comp.linux/browse_thread/thread/b9e50a78cf701d3e/b05de42861af783a?show_docid=b05de42861af783a"/>
  <title type="text">Re: FAT32 vs NTFS, can Linux be used under NTFS?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  On Sun, 15 Nov 2009 19:22:47 +0100, &amp;quot;J.O. Aho&amp;quot; &amp;lt;u...@example.net&amp;gt; &lt;br&gt; wrote: &lt;br&gt; &amp;lt;lol&amp;gt; No wonder. I&#39;m a babe in the woods with worldly things like &lt;br&gt; that. &amp;lt;g&amp;gt; &lt;br&gt; Wow, thanks! That should help.
  </summary>
  </entry>
</feed>
