<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
  <title>alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt Google Group</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.br/group/alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt</link>
  <description>Building your PC from motherboards and cards.</description>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
  <title>DDR Ram Help</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.br/group/alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt/browse_thread/thread/e5fc61c1a4cd0769/d5b1b758b18a530f?show_docid=d5b1b758b18a530f</link>
  <description>
  Hello all &lt;br&gt; I have a P4 (Titan) 8S648FX-RZ mobo and I want to put a stick of &amp;quot;DDR 512mb Pc3200&amp;quot; and a stick of &amp;quot;DDR 256mb Pc2700&amp;quot; , but I dont know which one goes in Dim slot 1 and dim slot 2. In the manual it says: &lt;br&gt; Memory 3 184-pin DDR DIMM sockets, supports up to 3GB DRAM (Max) &lt;br&gt; Supports DDR400/DDR333/DDR266 DIMM
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.br/group/alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt/browse_thread/thread/e5fc61c1a4cd0769/d5b1b758b18a530f?show_docid=d5b1b758b18a530f</guid>
  <author>
  fakeem...@hotmail.com
  (Gabriel Knight)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sun, 08 nov 2009 01:49:34 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Windows 7 Performance Index</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.br/group/alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt/browse_thread/thread/a32816ec8159ffa8/3cbf87cdffa28423?show_docid=3cbf87cdffa28423</link>
  <description>
  [...] &lt;br&gt; Ha! --&amp;gt; &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://hothardware.com/Articles/OCZ-ZDrive-m84-PCIExpress-SSD-Review/?page=6&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; The Z-Drive is like a Formula One race car. You almost have to push it to &lt;br&gt; perform everyday tasks. &lt;br&gt; Tony.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.br/group/alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt/browse_thread/thread/a32816ec8159ffa8/3cbf87cdffa28423?show_docid=3cbf87cdffa28423</guid>
  <author>
  gu...@bowl.org.nz
  (Tony Neville)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sun, 08 nov 2009 01:42:58 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: upgrade mistake</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.br/group/alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt/browse_thread/thread/10eeda5617d6f303/87cd9baa080e0417?show_docid=87cd9baa080e0417</link>
  <description>
  After reading further, you&#39;ll see that I advocate using the OS &lt;br&gt; determined by the apps that you deem critical. If the current software &lt;br&gt; performs all the tasks you require of it then there is no reason to &lt;br&gt; migrate it to a different OS, especially if you can&#39;t run your software &lt;br&gt; on the new OS. Stick with what works until it no longer works.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.br/group/alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt/browse_thread/thread/10eeda5617d6f303/87cd9baa080e0417?show_docid=87cd9baa080e0417</guid>
  <author>
  v...@nguard.lh
  (VanguardLH)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sun, 08 nov 2009 00:13:52 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Windows 7 Performance Index</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.br/group/alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt/browse_thread/thread/a32816ec8159ffa8/820d74209b7f0cbd?show_docid=820d74209b7f0cbd</link>
  <description>
  Maybe they&#39;re saving the perfect score, for this one. It is four SSDs &lt;br&gt; RAIDed together, into a single plugin card. &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.ocztechnology.com/products/solid_state_drives/ocz_z_drive_e84_pci_express_ssd&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; Paul
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.br/group/alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt/browse_thread/thread/a32816ec8159ffa8/820d74209b7f0cbd?show_docid=820d74209b7f0cbd</guid>
  <author>
  nos...@needed.com
  (Paul)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 07 nov 2009 23:49:29 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: upgrade mistake</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.br/group/alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt/browse_thread/thread/10eeda5617d6f303/2fcdbba51068bad9?show_docid=2fcdbba51068bad9</link>
  <description>
  And I&#39;ve had absolutely no reason to do so until now. &lt;br&gt; So, you advocate updating software that still works, but not the &lt;br&gt; operating system? Well that makes good sense. &lt;br&gt; Obviously not critical software, and I had other reasons. I am a heavy &lt;br&gt; multitasker and like to keep a lot of apps open and working in the
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.br/group/alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt/browse_thread/thread/10eeda5617d6f303/2fcdbba51068bad9?show_docid=2fcdbba51068bad9</guid>
  <author>
  fishf...@invalid.invalid
  (Fishface)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 07 nov 2009 23:22:13 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Windows 7 Performance Index</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.br/group/alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt/browse_thread/thread/a32816ec8159ffa8/85af455c922cb9ed?show_docid=85af455c922cb9ed</link>
  <description>
  Yeah... given that your GPU&#39;s gaming performance is so high, then one would &lt;br&gt; think handling an Aero desktop would be a comparatively remedial task. It &lt;br&gt; make no sense to me either. My scores came out even. &lt;br&gt; &amp;gt; Also, how a SATA hard drive be rated so low? Any &lt;br&gt; I&#39;ve have 3 WD caviar black SATA2 HDDs configured for RAID 0. The array
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.br/group/alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt/browse_thread/thread/a32816ec8159ffa8/85af455c922cb9ed?show_docid=85af455c922cb9ed</guid>
  <author>
  gu...@bowl.org.nz
  (Tony Neville)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 07 nov 2009 22:54:08 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: upgrade mistake</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.br/group/alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt/browse_thread/thread/10eeda5617d6f303/aed72170d8d02a13?show_docid=aed72170d8d02a13</link>
  <description>
  I have not yet done an actual switch from XP, but I am researching to get &lt;br&gt; ready for the move - the machine I built was designed for W7. What I have &lt;br&gt; been reading is that the upgrade path to upper versions of W7 is supposedly &lt;br&gt; seamless. Meaning if you installed the Home Premium edition and then wanted
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.br/group/alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt/browse_thread/thread/10eeda5617d6f303/aed72170d8d02a13?show_docid=aed72170d8d02a13</guid>
  <author>
  killtherob...@hal.net
  (TVeblen)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 07 nov 2009 22:34:08 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: DDR vs DDR2</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.br/group/alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt/browse_thread/thread/99920c7b176eb804/12f408f83087da17?show_docid=12f408f83087da17</link>
  <description>
  In article &amp;lt;hd45bt$u...@news.eternal-sept ember.org&amp;gt;, fishf...@invalid.invalid &lt;br&gt; says... &lt;br&gt; Yup. Everybody that thought the low prices on memory would last forever were wrong. &lt;br&gt; s
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.br/group/alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt/browse_thread/thread/99920c7b176eb804/12f408f83087da17?show_docid=12f408f83087da17</guid>
  <author>
  iva...@invalid.com
  (Steve)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 07 nov 2009 22:00:09 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: need help sharing a Canon printer on Windows 7</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.br/group/alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt/browse_thread/thread/b1967c2065e47d6a/1a17ae9ce14071b1?show_docid=1a17ae9ce14071b1</link>
  <description>
  perfect - if I&#39;d known this a week ago I&#39;d have had that printer up and &lt;br&gt; networked. Thanks.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.br/group/alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt/browse_thread/thread/b1967c2065e47d6a/1a17ae9ce14071b1?show_docid=1a17ae9ce14071b1</guid>
  <author>
  nos...@here.com
  (Sleepy)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 07 nov 2009 21:56:47 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: upgrade mistake</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.br/group/alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt/browse_thread/thread/10eeda5617d6f303/9ea5f1cc8810e661?show_docid=9ea5f1cc8810e661</link>
  <description>
  His CPU is definately a 64-bit one? &lt;br&gt; Tony.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.br/group/alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt/browse_thread/thread/10eeda5617d6f303/9ea5f1cc8810e661?show_docid=9ea5f1cc8810e661</guid>
  <author>
  gu...@bowl.org.nz
  (Tony Neville)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 07 nov 2009 21:38:05 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: upgrade mistake</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.br/group/alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt/browse_thread/thread/10eeda5617d6f303/7214de15ec7cba60?show_docid=7214de15ec7cba60</link>
  <description>
  What a brilliant post. You&#39;ve boiled it all down better than anything &lt;br&gt; I&#39;ve seen written to date &lt;br&gt; by some of those high priced nabobs. You&#39;ve also made it really really &lt;br&gt; clear that there &lt;br&gt; is absolutely no reason for all of us to change at this time or even in &lt;br&gt; the near term..
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.br/group/alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt/browse_thread/thread/10eeda5617d6f303/7214de15ec7cba60?show_docid=7214de15ec7cba60</guid>
  <author>
  nos...@nospam.net
  (Pen)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 07 nov 2009 20:51:53 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: upgrade mistake</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.br/group/alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt/browse_thread/thread/10eeda5617d6f303/ee4a1849a5167115?show_docid=ee4a1849a5167115</link>
  <description>
  With Windows 95 introducing 32-bit application support in 1995 and &lt;br&gt; 64-bit versions of Windows showing up in 2003 (which don&#39;t support &lt;br&gt; 16-bit apps), you&#39;ve had 6 to 14 YEARS to get rid of the old 16-bit &lt;br&gt; applications or get their authors to upgrade them to 32-bit versions. &lt;br&gt; Most likely you are using abandonware so it will never get upgraded. If
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.br/group/alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt/browse_thread/thread/10eeda5617d6f303/ee4a1849a5167115?show_docid=ee4a1849a5167115</guid>
  <author>
  v...@nguard.lh
  (VanguardLH)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 07 nov 2009 18:41:16 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: upgrade mistake</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.br/group/alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt/browse_thread/thread/10eeda5617d6f303/976a17afa7b9ef71?show_docid=976a17afa7b9ef71</link>
  <description>
  mac wrote: &lt;br&gt; The 32 bit to 64 bit requires a new custom installation, so the &amp;quot;upgrade&amp;quot; &lt;br&gt; process would not work, anyway. The worst case scenario is that you &lt;br&gt; would have to talk to a telephone representative with a thick west Asian &lt;br&gt; accent and explain what happened. &lt;br&gt; I found that ith 64-bit Windows 7, I could no longer run Win16 and any
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.br/group/alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt/browse_thread/thread/10eeda5617d6f303/976a17afa7b9ef71?show_docid=976a17afa7b9ef71</guid>
  <author>
  fishf...@invalid.invalid
  (Fishface)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 07 nov 2009 16:18:46 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Windows 7 Performance Index</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.br/group/alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt/browse_thread/thread/a32816ec8159ffa8/909b8fd3861b92a2?show_docid=909b8fd3861b92a2</link>
  <description>
  What puzzles me the most is why the Graphics for Gaming (6.2) so much higher &lt;br&gt; that the Graphics for Aero (4.2). I would have thought that the Aero &lt;br&gt; graphics would be less demanding than Gaming Graphics... &lt;br&gt; mac
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.br/group/alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt/browse_thread/thread/a32816ec8159ffa8/909b8fd3861b92a2?show_docid=909b8fd3861b92a2</guid>
  <author>
  a...@noemail.com
  (mac)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 07 nov 2009 16:13:26 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: DDR vs DDR2</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.br/group/alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt/browse_thread/thread/99920c7b176eb804/fcc21d69b74db3ca?show_docid=fcc21d69b74db3ca</link>
  <description>
  It has now officially doubled in price since I bought them!
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.br/group/alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt/browse_thread/thread/99920c7b176eb804/fcc21d69b74db3ca?show_docid=fcc21d69b74db3ca</guid>
  <author>
  fishf...@invalid.invalid
  (Fishface)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 07 nov 2009 15:56:31 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
