<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <id>http://groups.google.com.br/group/alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt</id>
  <title type="text">alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt Google Group</title>
  <subtitle type="text">
  Building your PC from motherboards and cards.
  </subtitle>
  <link href="/group/alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt/feed/atom_v1_0_msgs.xml" rel="self" title="alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt feed"/>
  <updated>2009-11-22T23:10:44Z</updated>
  <generator uri="http://groups.google.com.br" version="1.99">Google Groups</generator>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Paul</name>
  <email>nos...@needed.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-22T23:10:44Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.br/group/alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt/browse_thread/thread/b8a10e37f1f7049a/9791e3f828f3adee?show_docid=9791e3f828f3adee</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.br/group/alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt/browse_thread/thread/b8a10e37f1f7049a/9791e3f828f3adee?show_docid=9791e3f828f3adee"/>
  <title type="text">Re: New Window 7 build</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  I understand that one of the optimizations that exist in Vista or later, &lt;br&gt; is better handling of NUMA. There is a cost associated with moving a &lt;br&gt; process from Core1 to Core3, like cache coherency traffic (stuff in &lt;br&gt; one L2 cache, needing to move to the other L2 cache, on a demand &lt;br&gt; basis). A good OS design would realize moving from Core1 to Core2,
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>John Doe</name>
  <email>j...@usenetlove.invalid</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-22T22:57:34Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.br/group/alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt/browse_thread/thread/297e77bd1c91543c/f386c6511d246e67?show_docid=f386c6511d246e67</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.br/group/alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt/browse_thread/thread/297e77bd1c91543c/f386c6511d246e67?show_docid=f386c6511d246e67"/>
  <title type="text">FINALLYFAST.COM!</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Those were funny commercials IMO, especially the idiot face who &lt;br&gt; spits while saying &amp;quot;FINALLYFAST.COM!&amp;quot; &lt;br&gt; I am amused by commercials that try to sucker users into believing &lt;br&gt; their Internet service speed is slow because their computer is &lt;br&gt; slow.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>GT</name>
  <email>contactgt_rem_ov...@hotmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-22T22:14:41Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.br/group/alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt/browse_thread/thread/e0c629f1062f7170/9b5258494f7ce2a7?show_docid=9b5258494f7ce2a7</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.br/group/alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt/browse_thread/thread/e0c629f1062f7170/9b5258494f7ce2a7?show_docid=9b5258494f7ce2a7"/>
  <title type="text">Re: ALWAYS close USB flash drive before removing?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  You missed a space.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Ant</name>
  <email>a...@zimage.comant</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-22T21:44:40Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.br/group/alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt/browse_thread/thread/e0c629f1062f7170/0a3d8138393c4f21?show_docid=0a3d8138393c4f21</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.br/group/alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt/browse_thread/thread/e0c629f1062f7170/0a3d8138393c4f21?show_docid=0a3d8138393c4f21"/>
  <title type="text">Re: ALWAYS close USB flash drive before removing?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  On 11/22/2009 1:30 PM PT, Arno typed: &lt;br&gt; Question: How does one unmount/dismount in Windows 98 SE since it &lt;br&gt; doesn&#39;t have those USB safety removal option in its system tray?
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Jerry Peters</name>
  <email>je...@example.invalid</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-22T21:35:24Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.br/group/alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt/browse_thread/thread/e0c629f1062f7170/3729cfbb870edc93?show_docid=3729cfbb870edc93</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.br/group/alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt/browse_thread/thread/e0c629f1062f7170/3729cfbb870edc93?show_docid=3729cfbb870edc93"/>
  <title type="text">Re: ALWAYS close USB flash drive before removing?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  1) I don&#39;t trust windows *at all*. I use Linux almost entirely. With &lt;br&gt; Linux, one performs a umount before removing a block device. &lt;br&gt; 2) When I do use Windows, I don&#39;t trust it to do anything properly. &lt;br&gt; So far I&#39;ve rarely been disappointed. &lt;br&gt; 3) Making unwarnted assumptions often *seems* safe, until reality
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Arno</name>
  <email>m...@privacy.net</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-22T21:33:25Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.br/group/alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt/browse_thread/thread/e0c629f1062f7170/41e291d716f31634?show_docid=41e291d716f31634</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.br/group/alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt/browse_thread/thread/e0c629f1062f7170/41e291d716f31634?show_docid=41e291d716f31634"/>
  <title type="text">Re: ALWAYS close USB flash drive before removing?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Well, since you will very likely never hire me, I can safely &lt;br&gt; state that you still do not understand the issue. As everything &lt;br&gt; relevant has alredy been discussed, there is nothing more &lt;br&gt; I can say. &lt;br&gt; Arno
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Arno</name>
  <email>m...@privacy.net</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-22T21:30:59Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.br/group/alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt/browse_thread/thread/e0c629f1062f7170/c19ce388b7ebfdb0?show_docid=c19ce388b7ebfdb0</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.br/group/alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt/browse_thread/thread/e0c629f1062f7170/c19ce388b7ebfdb0?show_docid=c19ce388b7ebfdb0"/>
  <title type="text">Re: ALWAYS close USB flash drive before removing?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  The dismount is pretty important. Otherwise an application &lt;br&gt; could start writing between the &amp;quot;you may now remove...&amp;quot; &lt;br&gt; message and the actual removal. &lt;br&gt; Arno
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Baron</name>
  <email>baron.nos...@linuxmaniac.nospam.net</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-22T20:57:09Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.br/group/alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt/browse_thread/thread/a491fd4b739cb036/83f9c3cfa0917b35?show_docid=83f9c3cfa0917b35</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.br/group/alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt/browse_thread/thread/a491fd4b739cb036/83f9c3cfa0917b35?show_docid=83f9c3cfa0917b35"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Power supplies with solid polymer caps</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  I&#39;m in complete agreement with Arfa. Internal heating caused by the &lt;br&gt; ever increasing switch mode power supply frequencies is the most common &lt;br&gt; cause of failure. High external temperatures don&#39;t help one bit since &lt;br&gt; it reduces the components ability to get rid of internally generated &lt;br&gt; heat. &lt;br&gt; A place where I&#39;m finding more and more capacitor failures is in the
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>kony</name>
  <email>s...@spam.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-22T20:13:55Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.br/group/alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt/browse_thread/thread/e0c629f1062f7170/d4b6f8adc7569538?show_docid=d4b6f8adc7569538</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.br/group/alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt/browse_thread/thread/e0c629f1062f7170/d4b6f8adc7569538?show_docid=d4b6f8adc7569538"/>
  <title type="text">Re: ALWAYS close USB flash drive before removing?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Unplugging a USB flash drive without using Safely Remove has &lt;br&gt; nothing to do with &amp;quot;professional risk management&amp;quot;. If you &lt;br&gt; are vaguely implying professional risk management as &lt;br&gt; requiring retention of data, it becomes a matter of &lt;br&gt; redundant storage of that data, not whether you swing a &lt;br&gt; chicken around your head, dance around a sombrero, and face
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>kony</name>
  <email>s...@spam.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-22T20:00:24Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.br/group/alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt/browse_thread/thread/e0c629f1062f7170/cf7de7cbc43ca744?show_docid=cf7de7cbc43ca744</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.br/group/alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt/browse_thread/thread/e0c629f1062f7170/cf7de7cbc43ca744?show_docid=cf7de7cbc43ca744"/>
  <title type="text">Re: ALWAYS close USB flash drive before removing?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 14:58:43 -0500, kony &amp;lt;s...@spam.com&amp;gt; &lt;br&gt; wrote: &lt;br&gt; I should clarify, that I meant no writing of data that &lt;br&gt; wasn&#39;t already happening expediently without doing that, it &lt;br&gt; does also dismount the volume.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>kony</name>
  <email>s...@spam.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-22T19:58:43Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.br/group/alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt/browse_thread/thread/e0c629f1062f7170/2a5872ed0ccf6cd8?show_docid=2a5872ed0ccf6cd8</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.br/group/alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt/browse_thread/thread/e0c629f1062f7170/2a5872ed0ccf6cd8?show_docid=2a5872ed0ccf6cd8"/>
  <title type="text">Re: ALWAYS close USB flash drive before removing?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:02:30 +0000 (UTC), Jerry Peters &lt;br&gt; ... which is drifting into the realm of tin-foil hats and &lt;br&gt; myths. &lt;br&gt; I use USB flash drives constantly, it&#39;s really not a problem &lt;br&gt; and the logic isn&#39;t sound for using Safely Remove. &lt;br&gt; You: &lt;br&gt; 1) Distrust Windows to work properly after MS has already &lt;br&gt; stated you won&#39;t need to use Safely Remove if the default
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Metspitzer</name>
  <email>kilow...@charter.net</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-22T19:33:22Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.br/group/alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt/browse_thread/thread/e149751b921b8672/83e89a3a23ce2014?show_docid=83e89a3a23ce2014</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.br/group/alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt/browse_thread/thread/e149751b921b8672/83e89a3a23ce2014?show_docid=83e89a3a23ce2014"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Wont&#39; read CD drives</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  On Fri, 20 Nov 2009 14:54:51 -0500, Metspitzer &amp;lt;kilow...@charter.net&amp;gt; &lt;br&gt; wrote: &lt;br&gt; I think I may have fixed this by deleting the drives from the device &lt;br&gt; manager and letting XP reinstall them. &lt;br&gt; Thanks everyone
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Arfa Daily</name>
  <email>arfa.da...@ntlworld.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-22T17:26:02Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.br/group/alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt/browse_thread/thread/a491fd4b739cb036/fbfae9a6b183b544?show_docid=fbfae9a6b183b544</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.br/group/alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt/browse_thread/thread/a491fd4b739cb036/fbfae9a6b183b544?show_docid=fbfae9a6b183b544"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Power supplies with solid polymer caps</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  So, what exactly are you saying ... ? That better quality components &lt;br&gt; tolerate abuse more readily than cheapo crap ones ? Very profound ... I &lt;br&gt; don&#39;t think that is actually at odds with anything I said, is it ? I seem to &lt;br&gt; recall in my original reply to William that part of the reason that he may &lt;br&gt; have had good luck in regard to electrolytic failure, is the fact that he
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Bioboffin</name>
  <email>j...@myhouse.invalid</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-22T17:16:52Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.br/group/alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt/browse_thread/thread/b8a10e37f1f7049a/18423c676a1a0128?show_docid=18423c676a1a0128</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.br/group/alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt/browse_thread/thread/b8a10e37f1f7049a/18423c676a1a0128?show_docid=18423c676a1a0128"/>
  <title type="text">Re: New Window 7 build</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  I have found quad core to run significantly faster with Windows 7. W7 seems &lt;br&gt; to have optimised the multiprocessor threads rather better than Vista or XP. &lt;br&gt; Whether or not your applications will benefit is a rather more moot point.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Fishface</name>
  <email>fishf...@invalid.invalid</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-22T16:09:46Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.br/group/alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt/browse_thread/thread/b879938e95de9caa/aafe2a821753f422?show_docid=aafe2a821753f422</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.br/group/alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt/browse_thread/thread/b879938e95de9caa/aafe2a821753f422?show_docid=aafe2a821753f422"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Hardware problem - RAM or MOBO?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  For dual channel operation and maximum performance, you want &lt;br&gt; to have the two sticks in like-colored slots, usually 1+3 or 2+4. As &lt;br&gt; I recall, you purchased DDR2 1066 memory. Maybe these? &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820231144&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; They&#39;re specified to require 2.0 to 2.1 volts at rated speed. All the
  </summary>
  </entry>
</feed>
