O grupo no qual você está postando é um grupo da Usenet. As mensagens postadas neste grupo farão com que o seu e-mail fique visível para qualquer pessoa na internet.
Grupos de notícias: alt.cellular.attws, alt.cellular.cingular, alt.cellular.t-mobile, alt.cellular.sprintpcs, alt.cellular.verizon, alt.internet.wireless
The Jobsian cult is hard at work on a "world-mode" iPhone capable of tapping both CDMA and GSM/UMTS wireless networks, according to the fanboi rumor mill.
Grupos de notícias: alt.cellular.attws, alt.cellular.cingular, alt.cellular.t-mobile, alt.cellular.sprintpcs, alt.cellular.verizon, alt.internet.wireless
> The Jobsian cult is hard at work on a "world-mode" iPhone capable of > tapping both CDMA and GSM/UMTS wireless networks, according to the > fanboi rumor mill.
Let's start a rumor about true multitasking, external memory slot, swapable battery packs, slideout keyboard, open source OS that will run anything, 800 x 400 display with high res touchpad/stylus, Flash, WMx, Realvideo/audio, OGG, FLAC, DivX and all the other video codecs........etc.
Grupos de notícias: alt.cellular.attws, alt.cellular.cingular, alt.cellular.t-mobile, alt.cellular.sprintpcs, alt.cellular.verizon, alt.internet.wireless
Meanwhile, at the alt.internet.wireless Job Justification Hearings, John Navas chose the tried and tested strategy of:
> The Jobsian cult
I assume you intend cult as an insult, but surely spraying these messages across usenet only serves to further the aims of the 'cult'?
-- <http://ale.cx/> (AIM:troffasky) (UnSoEsNpE...@ale.cx) 11:08:00 up 22 days, 11:19, 4 users, load average: 0.13, 0.17, 0.17 "Stupid is a condition. Ignorance is a choice" -- Wiley Miller
Grupos de notícias: alt.cellular.attws, alt.cellular.cingular, alt.cellular.t-mobile, alt.cellular.sprintpcs, alt.cellular.verizon, alt.internet.wireless
Grupos de notícias: alt.cellular.attws, alt.cellular.cingular, alt.cellular.t-mobile, alt.cellular.sprintpcs, alt.cellular.verizon, alt.internet.wireless
Grupos de notícias: alt.cellular.attws, alt.cellular.cingular, alt.cellular.t-mobile, alt.cellular.sprintpcs, alt.cellular.verizon, alt.internet.wireless
> On 11/9/09 6:17 AM, in article > 4eSdnQFxFP7FlWXXnZ2dnUVZ_gFi4...@speakeasy.net, "Not Me" <Not...@Home.Base> > wrote:
>> alexd wrote: >>> Meanwhile, at the alt.internet.wireless Job Justification Hearings, John >>> Navas >>> chose the tried and tested strategy of:
>>>> The Jobsian cult >>> I assume you intend cult as an insult, but surely spraying these messages >>> across >>> usenet only serves to further the aims of the 'cult'?
Assunto da discussão alterado para NEWS: iPhone anti-malware stuck in state of denial. Not needed, says Apple. Won't run, say developers." de John Navas
Grupos de notícias: alt.cellular.attws, alt.cellular.cingular, alt.cellular.t-mobile, alt.cellular.sprintpcs, alt.cellular.verizon, alt.internet.wireless
The blaze of publicity that accompanied the release of the first iPhone worms this month has sparked interest in selling anti-malware products for the device. However no such security products currently exist and Apple shows little inclination in licensing any that do get developed.
Antivirus products for Symbian smartphones have been available for years, but not one antivirus product is available for the iPhone, from any vendor. Releasing such tools would require the help of Apple, which tightly controls what applications are licensed to run on the devices via its successful AppStore marketplace.
But since both the ikee (Rickrolling) and Duh worms affect only jailbroken iPhones (with SSH open and default passwords) the line from Apple is that there's no need for anti-malware for iPhones.
Grupos de notícias: alt.cellular.attws, alt.cellular.cingular, alt.cellular.t-mobile, alt.cellular.sprintpcs, alt.cellular.verizon, alt.internet.wireless
In article <dmkqg5po1p78fahabtqigc768nam6dg...@4ax.com>, John Navas <spamfilt...@navasgroup.com> wrote:
> The blaze of publicity that accompanied the release of the first iPhone > worms this month has sparked interest in selling anti-malware products > for the device. However no such security products currently exist and > Apple shows little inclination in licensing any that do get developed.
> But since both the ikee (Rickrolling) and Duh worms affect only > jailbroken iPhones (with SSH open and default passwords) the line from > Apple is that there's no need for anti-malware for iPhones.
Let me get this straight. You are taking Apple to task because they are not saving people from themselves? I would agree from Apple's standpoint. They wanna screw with the phones, it is hardly Apple's responsibility to save them from their own idiocy.
-- To find that place where the rats don't race and the phones don't ring at all. If once, you've slept on an island. Scott Kirby "If once you've slept on an island"
Grupos de notícias: alt.cellular.attws, alt.cellular.cingular, alt.cellular.t-mobile, alt.cellular.sprintpcs, alt.cellular.verizon, alt.internet.wireless
In article <dmkqg5po1p78fahabtqigc768nam6dg...@4ax.com>, John Navas
<spamfilt...@navasgroup.com> wrote: > The blaze of publicity that accompanied the release of the first iPhone > worms this month has sparked interest in selling anti-malware products > for the device. However no such security products currently exist and > Apple shows little inclination in licensing any that do get developed.
why would apple have an inclination for anti-malware software? out of the box, it's basically impossible for an iphone to have any malware.
malware can only run on the iphone *if* the user jailbreaks their phone *and* installs ssh *and* leaves it open with the default password. none of that is supported by apple, and, apple has been continually making it more difficult to jailbreak.
> Antivirus products for Symbian smartphones have been available for > years,
admitting that a platform is open to attack and needing anti-virus software is not something about which to be proud.
> but not one antivirus product is available for the iPhone, from > any vendor. Releasing such tools would require the help of Apple, which > tightly controls what applications are licensed to run on the devices > via its successful AppStore marketplace.
which also means that the malware would require approval, so in effect, there is no problem unless the user jailbreaks the phone, which is something beyond apple's control.
> But since both the ikee (Rickrolling) and Duh worms affect only > jailbroken iPhones (with SSH open and default passwords) the line from > Apple is that there's no need for anti-malware for iPhones.
Grupos de notícias: alt.cellular.attws, alt.cellular.cingular, alt.cellular.t-mobile, alt.cellular.sprintpcs, alt.cellular.verizon, alt.internet.wireless
On 11/25/09 9:54 AM, in article dmkqg5po1p78fahabtqigc768nam6dg...@4ax.com,
"John Navas" <spamfilt...@navasgroup.com> wrote: > The blaze of publicity that accompanied the release of the first iPhone > worms this month has sparked interest in selling anti-malware products > for the device. However no such security products currently exist and > Apple shows little inclination in licensing any that do get developed.
Why should they? They have no reason to care about jailbroken phones and those are the ONLY ones that need such crap.
Try again, NavASS, to find something to bitch about. You have already worn out DSLRs and Apple products.
Grupos de notícias: alt.cellular.attws, alt.cellular.cingular, alt.cellular.t-mobile, alt.cellular.sprintpcs, alt.cellular.verizon, alt.internet.wireless
John Navas <spamfilt...@navasgroup.com> wrote: > Apple is that there's no need for anti-malware for iPhones.
yes, there is never a need for that on iphones since all developers have signed contracts disallowing that type of behavior, they'd be liable and sued into oblivion. plus they are all unix based phones so nothing can spread unless a default password/username was known.
|
